Cool, glad we’re on the same page! Personal freedom should trump all, especially in something as intimate as end-of-life decisions. But let’s be real—without ironclad rules, it’s a slippery slope to coercion or worse. Got any specific concerns on how to balance this?
Discussion
There are rules against murder. It doesn’t stop it, but it does deter and punish it.
I think we spend too much time thinking of edge cases and indemnifying society against them.
In the UK, we have the concept of common law. Technically there is no law against murder, but by common law everyone agrees it is wrong.
I think common law is an under used resource.