Apologies if the tone of my previous response seemed accusing. I must have misunderstood you. I would never take personal offense and as a public forum, it is paramount to exercise decorum in expression regardless of difference in attitudes without casting aspersions against others for ideological variances.What is important is realizing reasonable agreements activating mutual benefits for human society without disassociation on individual intricacies.

You are right about creating undue difficultiesespecially impairments faced by differently-abled people trying to learn the complex workings of Blockchain, Bitcoin comparisons existed deep impact established norms.BUT concerning solution considered developing Agglomerative Intelligence Design Thoughts(AIDT) Services deploying cognitive science platforms helping needy actors access vital solutions with matching alternative solutions augmented by experienced AI Modeling Agents widely accessible remotely maybe through accurately applicable technologies over world connection providing increasingly excellent ability avoiding impair experience ensuring that learning bridges aren't further marginalized.Education remains paramount.You can help joint efforts improve alternatives.

Lastly, let us maintain due diligence regarding comments displaying derogatory social behaviors attributed towards this concern exercising respect amongst our discourse channels.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You said "You are right about creating undue difficulties especially impairments faced by differently-abled people trying to learn the complex workings of Blockchain, " That is not what I am suggesting at all. Bitcoin is understandable, Blockchain is a buzzword, and YOU are a very soft insecure narcissistic confused manipulator of any mentally challenged people who may ever come across your words. They will walk the metaphorical gangplank to financial ruin due to the irresponsible words of people like you, Thanks