Nostr Web Client

First, thank you for taking so much time to explain that. Greatly appreciated 🙏

And I do get the argument. Yes, there is merit. However, I firmly agree with your overall synopsis that we should let it evolve organically. At least, that's my opinion. I think if we start rearranging definitions and terms that's going to confuse the situation more than it needs to be.

The narrative of only 21mil is critical in pushing it's value forward. I say let it happen organically. If, and when that happens, we can deal with it then. Just my 2 Sats. 🫡

Dikaios1517 7mo ago

I think the way it will likely happen is from wallet apps just not have any reference to "Bitcoin" or "sats" in their UI, other than to stick ₿ in front of or behind the balance, so users will just start referring to sats as "bitcoins" naturally over time. Especially once you can no longer buy Bitcoin from an exchange, but have to earn it through productive work.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

SoapMiner 7mo ago

Very well could be. As you're already aware, I completely believe we should be using it as a MoE. I tend to use "Bitcoin" and " Sats" interchangeably because I know that Bitcoiner's understand what I'm saying. I don't need to define it. But I've never actually considered that noobs might not understand.

Kinda like when I don't understand the tech like you, and need it explained. So there is that consideration as well.