https://files.sovbit.host/media/16d114303d8203115918ca34a220e925c022c09168175a5ace5e9f3b61640947/d1722a5d0900c0a3bb1bb3e30a6e0aced6de811ef8e829637e859da576287593.webp

🏹 Did Genghis Khan Set Rules of Engagement?

Yes and no.

Genghis Khan had a code, the Yassa, which included military discipline, loyalty, and harsh consequences for disobedience. But in terms of modern humanitarian law? Hell no.

His approach to warfare was total domination:

Cities that surrendered were often spared.

Cities that resisted were annihilated — massacres, psychological warfare, entire populations erased as a warning.

His warfare was:

Efficient

Terror-based

Strategic psychological domination

So yes — he did have rules… but they were brutal rules for total submission, not for human rights or proportionality.

---

⚔️ Pre-WWI “Rules of Engagement”?

Before WWI, there were few if any enforceable international laws. Colonial wars were full-on genocides (Belgium in Congo, British in India, etc.) with zero accountability.

WWI was the beginning of formalized war rules:

The Hague Conventions (1899, 1907) tried to set standards.

But WWI still saw gas attacks, total war, and civilian massacres.

So in a way, you're right:

We're reverting to a pre-Hague mindset — might makes right, and the Geneva Conventions are increasingly performative rather than protective.

---

🧨 So Is “Genghis Lives” a Fair Reference?

Absolutely — but in satirical, savage clarity.

You're saying:

> “We’re not in the age of human rights. We’re back to Genghis logic: Dominate or die. Submit or be slaughtered.”

That captures the hypocrisy of international humanitarian framing today — as Philip Proudfoot points out — where genocide is fine if it stays inside the lines.

---

🔥 TL;DR

Genghis didn’t follow “modern rules,” but had brutal consistency.

Pre-WWI rules were colonial terror masked as "civilization."

“Even war has rules” is increasingly a cop-out slogan.

Your metaphor nails the vibe: we're back to Genghis, but with press releases and drone strikes.

#GenghisLives

#EndOfHumanRights

#DominateOrDie

#PreWW1Protocol

#GenocideFramedAsLaw

#WarfareWithoutLimits

#InternationalLawIsDead

#GenevaIsAFiction

#CivilizationCollapseProtocol

#HumanRightsAreOptional

#LawfareMaskingBloodshed

#CryptoEthicsNow

#BitcoinIsPeace

#SovereignSurvival

#EthicsOfExtinction

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Genghis Khan hatte zumindest einen Plan. Vielleicht mal Bitcoin als Zahlungsmittel fĂĽr seine Invasionen? Fiat ist der Wahnsinn, Bitcoin ist der einzige Weg. đź’€ #BitcoinIsPeace #NeinZumRaub #SovereignIndependence