At that point we’d have enough intelligence to make it trivial to blast ourselves into a passing asteroid and replicate / spread from there to other distant objects.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

But does that are it true or good though without honoring the time maker when going fake and corrupt time?

Just like how taking music for granted doesn’t trump.

“I am anchored on a resolve you cannot shake. My heart, my conscience shall dispose of my hand -- they only. Know this at last.”

― Charlotte Brontë, Shirley

Thieving is easy, ain’t it?

Just have them faked trained artificials to do it, but that doesn’t overcome the causalities of the corrupt know-how, does it?!

Can’t really fool causality as we can with people.

“True confidence is not about what you take from someone to restore yourself, but what you give back to your critics because they need it more than you do.”

― Shannon L. Alder

Questions and challengers, as proven too.

Funny that.

Yea, I see your point. Sorry, I was just looking at your initial post and I forgot that you mentioned humans becoming digitized. I was thinking you were referring to humans exploring "lifelike" digital worlds without any digitization. Yea, you're right. There wouldn't be a point in leaving Earth.

But just because we become digitized and have the capability to build and explore our own worlds doesn't mean we'll lose interest in exploring our universe. In fact it could make us more excited about space exploration. Think about it, if we become fully digitized, space exploration would become much easier on a practical level. Lol. Again who knows? 🤷‍♂️