Even distribution of a scarce asset is incompatible with free agency.

We can test this by considering a computer simulation of a free market where simulated individuals interact with free agency and varying degrees of knowledge.

There is no outcome under the sun in such a simulation where a scarce asset would end up evenly distributed.

Even if the asset was given away for free, it would be sold by those who didn't understand or value it, to those who did.

The logical expectation of a decentralized, scarce asset is that it cannot be evenly distributed because it is decentralized.

Attempting to make a scarce asset evenly distributed would require absolute central planning, and even that would fail due to the reasons already stated.

The best approach to improve the distribution of Bitcoin is by sharing knowledge and developing or spreading practical tools.