I haven't been keeping up with this but it seems like a huge mistake and a great way to bring quasi legitimacy to bitcoin adjacent shitcoins and possibly cause irreversible damage to bitcoin in the process.
"In Bip300, txns are not signed via cryptographic key. Instead, they are "signed" by hashpower, over time."
That's not a little tweak of the code.
To be honest, I don't know much technicals about drivechains but he lost me as soon as he started comparing drivechains with shitcoins. We don't want any shitcoin BS on Bitcoin blockchain. Bitcoin has bigger fish to fry.
> i don't understand this thing or what someone is saying about the thing i don't understand but i'm against it anyways.
🤦♂️
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
And from what I heard in that podcast, you need separate node for every individual drivechain which doesn't make any sense. Like how would you vote for that drivechain? Everything sounded so vague to me.
Thread collapsed
like what? having the same price for 6 years?
Do you think that this statement will remain true forever? How it has anything to do with price? You can still have drivechain soft fork enabled and price will still remain flat. I don't see how drivechain will significantly affect Bitcoin price (I would also say that it won't significantly (positively )affect Bitcoin price.
People are stupid. Bitcoin was at $4000 six years ago.
I only 7.5x'd my money in the past 6 years Bitcoin Is broken..
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed