The state of legal protection in the territorial monopoly known as the United Kingdom in recent decades:
> Several men were charged but the prosecutions were dropped, and months later, she was abducted by a group of men and forced to perform oral sex on 23 men while a gun was held to her head. She was also raped.
> Afterwards, CS-A372 was placed back in care. She tried to cooperate with police investigations but felt very conflicted and she repeatedly self-harmed. CS-A372 considered that she was failed by the police and children’s social care and that there was a lack of coordination between agencies tasked with protecting her.
Sidenote: Forcing someone to perform oral sex is rape on its own by definition. This newspeak of modern society is absolutely intolerable.
https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/crime/grooming-gang-victims-authorities-iicsa-b2005083.html
This is the natural tendency of states and especially publicly owned states, that is, democracies where control is thrown about and there is no clear assignment of responsibility. The lack of pricing information for protection and the lack of innovation or quality control of monopoly leads to the effective legalization of abhorrent crimes due to the lack of recourse to swift and just defense.
The appropriate and measured response to such rape at gunpoint would be as follows: