Yes I know, what I fear is that any side resort to the power of state mandates to push its world view instead of doing the hard and painful work of open discussion. For example, number of deaths, accurate account of each side of the people involved, etc...
I think whatever comes out of that never ending proces of open debate is far superior, healthier and long lasting than any "stability" that is enforced by silencing any side.
We are all bised, but we are biased in different ways and that can be a good thing if we dare to speak our minds and listen. To speak and let others speak, and this also gives more legitimacy to whatever conclusion we arrive than pushing our narratives with force.
I think that will heal any historic wound far better. π«π§