Corndalorian and his glowie circle are way too dumb to talk about random seed generation at this level of expertise.

But suddenly they start posting about it after I post my Nintendo crypto tool bounty that's going to raise awareness?

I wonder if it's coincidence. It's not like these are new ideas; it could easily just be coincidence that these people happen to be bringing the topic up a few days after me.

Random seed generation isn't the only important topic I talk about in the spec's for my bounty. I also mention end-to-end encryption.

These same glowies have probably posted disinformation about end-to-end encryption that I've called them out on before, but not about seed generation.

So they can't start talking about the big end-to-end encryption lie now, without engaging with my posts or showing any sign I inspired it, without it being obvious and provable that I was way ahead of them on it.

But they can talk about random seed generation at an expert level, without engaging with my posts or showing any sign I inspired it, and for all I know it's just coincidence.

If manual seed randomization continues being a major topic, they can take most of the credit for bringing it into mainstream discussion, because this is Jack Dorsey's malware-style social media based on "following" people and they have way more followers. If they credited me with inspiring them, I would then get a small amount of the credit, but if they don't, then there's probably no way of knowing if I had any part in it at all, or just pure coincidence.

The notes on seed randomization were some of the most novel and interesting parts of my Nintendo crypto tool bounty. If I did coincidentally post it at about the same time as others were going to coincidentally bring that topic into mainstream discussion around nostr, perhaps I should have posted it months sooner, so it could have had its intrigue boosted by the novelty of that part for a longer time.

Of course, if it isn't coincidence, making the whole thing less novel and interesting would be a good way to weaken its ability to spread knowledge, such as awareness of the big E2EE lie.

And if true, that would be the first impact the bounty has had: forcing some glowies to spread info they don't like, to detract from other info they don't like.

And whether true in this case or not, that will be a common theme as long as I live. The deep state tries hard to make sure I don't get recognition or acclaim, so they will always take any opportunity to diminish any obvious role I could have in the spread of an important idea. It's dangerous for me to fight them too hard on it, so it will often be true that my best strategy is pressuring them to spread info they don't like, to detract from other info they don't like.

nostr:note1wysfk02v7k0cjx592dzggydyazaeyp752py3u4gq6k7p94xwrl9s5eek9a