Consolidation equals breaking them. Spend them. Remix change.
I did have one question though nostr:nprofile1qyfhwumn8ghj7ur4wfcxcetsv9njuetn9uq3wamnwvaz7tmzv46xztnwdaehgunfdshxxctd9uq3samnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7tn9ejxjem8dahjucm0d5hszxmhwden5te0vejk2ern9ehx7um5wghxyctwvshhgmmw0yq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet59uq32amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7tcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qqspnzgrfett3asxcuj0gksje6z2zxzpvgd27uvz58m9vsuqh8zzw6cvuxq7v or whoever #AskNostr can illuminate me:
After the coinjoin is done, you have a bunch of private UTXOs, but then you send them all to another wallet. But wouldn't that normally mean that you're consolidating them all back into one single, breaking privacy?
On the other hand, in the video it would seem you are actually receiving as many UTXOs as you're sending. So would that multiply fees accordingly (while keeping privacy, maybe?)?
Discussion
But in the video it looks like the target wallet is receiving as many UTXO's as Wasabi is sending, instead of consolidating them. That's what I don't fully understand.
Did you figure this out? This is where my understanding stalls out as well haha
Nope. I'm quite sure for some reason nostr:nprofile1qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2ap0qyfhwumn8ghj7ur4wfcxcetsv9njuetn9uq32amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7tcpzamhxue69uhkyet5vyhxummnw3exjmpwvdsk6tcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9uhxtnyd9nkwmm09e3k7mf0qydhwumn8ghj7en9v4j8xtnwdaehgu3wvfskuep0w3hku7gppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qqspnzgrfett3asxcuj0gksje6z2zxzpvgd27uvz58m9vsuqh8zzw6cnsmf5f has me muted too :/
Tragic. My current understanding is that consolidating reduces privacy but less so the less you consolidate / more you spread out said consolidation over time, and keep consolidation amounts random