If women can do everything as well or better than men, doesn't that necessarily mean that men are less than women? Because everything that men do, can be done by women equally as well. And there are some things that women do better than men.

If that's the case why wouldn't evolution - based on survival of the fittest - have rid the world of men a long time ago?

Doesn't the fact that men survived strongly imply that there must be some things that men are more fit for than women?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.