Replying to Avatar Chris Liss

Think it’s a war on privacy in order to control and tax. They don’t care if you use it, so long as they know you used it and can tax it.

What they don’t realize is when everyone is using it, and it’s no longer in their control, they will lose this power eventually anyway.

Maintain as much privacy as you see fit through whatever means you deem necessary. But IMO, the real battle is adoption.

Tick tock, next block is not only keeping track of the height, it’s a countdown toward fiat irrelevance, the waning of the peak centralization and control era.

nostr:note10gps3zu2syggn4nedtdj2lykqz84lezsm4wsqdpec50q6qjnchnsgd7jcg

Avatar
QnA 1y ago

I agree on their intent, but not on the outcome. They only need to make a few examples of people using Bitcoin the 'wrong way' and the majority will fall into line and use their authorized rails. This is not a foregone conclusion like you suggest IMO.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Chris Liss 1y ago

But bitcoin *is* the rail.

Thread collapsed