**Poland Vs EU: New Survey Shows Poles Reject Cashless Society, Ban On Combustion Engines, & Restrictions On Meat Sales**

Poland Vs EU: New Survey Shows Poles Reject Cashless Society, Ban On Combustion Engines, & Restrictions On Meat Sales

_Authored by Grzegorz Adamczyk via Remix News,_ (https://rmx.news/poland/poland-vs-eu-new-survey-shows-poles-reject-cashless-society-ban-on-combustion-engines-and-restrictions-on-meat-and-clothing-sales/)

**_Poles are not happy with what the EU is selling..._**

?itok=dbOnn5o3 (?itok=dbOnn5o3)

Poles are opposed to the EU’s policy of banning combustion engine vehicles and to ideas circulating in the EU on forests, meat, clothes and a cashless economy, according to a poll carried out by the European Policy Research Center (CBPE)

The poll reports that **67 percent of respondents are opposed to an EU rule that will ban Europeans from registering combustion engine (https://rmx.news/poland/poles-against-eu-ban-on-combustion-engine-cars/) vehicles starting in 2035**. The idea of the EU ban is supported by only 28 percent of Poles.

The opposition to the EU ban on such vehicles is seen across a broad spectrum of Polish society, including urban and rural inhabitants, as well as both those with higher degrees and those who have only finished high school.

The CPBE survey also asked respondents their views on the idea of **transferring the power over forests (https://rmx.news/poland/polish-conservatives-slam-eu-attempt-to-take-control-of-forests/) to the EU, away from the member states. Over half of the respondents, 57 percent, opposed such an idea.** Only 34 percent supported it. Once again, the opposition to the idea is similar across all age and socio-economic groups.

Another idea being discussed in the EU is limiting the consumption of meat to 16 kilograms per person, per year, as well as limiting the sale of clothes to eight new items per person.

**Only 21 percent backed the meat consumption reduction target,** with 76 percent opposed. The results were similar with regard to the purchase of new clothes, with 23 percent supporting it and 73 percent against.

Poles are also against a cashless economy (https://rmx.news/article/over-500000-austrians-demand-right-to-cash-payments-be-added-to-countrys-constitution/). The European Parliament recently (https://cointelegraph.com/news/european-parliament-report-recommends-researching-but-not-launching-digital-euro) recommended that a digital euro be researched but not yet launched. Privacy advocates warn that a cashless society could have grave consequences for personal freedom, with authorities able to track in all transactions in real time. This may be a prerequisite to imposing strict limits on what people can buy, including clothing items and meat products. Digital currencies may also be tied to social credit scores relating to political opinions and social behavior, as they are in China.

**Advocates for a cashless society within Brussels argue that digital currencies would limit the black market. However, 81 percent of Poles oppose getting rid of cash, with only 17 percent in favor.**

Similar opposition to a cashless society can be seen in nations such as Austria, Switzerland and Germany. Last year, over 500,000 Austrians signed a petition (https://rmx.news/article/over-500000-austrians-demand-right-to-cash-payments-be-added-to-countrys-constitution/) calling for the right to use cash to be enshrined in the Austrian constitution. As a result, a referendum on the issue will be launched within the country. With a population of 8.9 million, the massive show of support for the right to pay with cash demonstrates the growing movement against digital money, including central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

As Remix News previously reported (https://rmx.news/article/over-500000-austrians-demand-right-to-cash-payments-be-added-to-countrys-constitution/), **globalist institutions like the World Economic Forum have long lobbied for a cashless society** and have routinely run articles such as “Why we should try to make cash obsolete (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2014/10/bob-keiller-electronic-payments-cash/),” “The benefits of a cashless society (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/01/benefits-cashless-society-mobile-payments/)” and “Should cash be abolished? (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/01/should-cash-be-abolished/)” Back in 2017, economist Joseph Stiglitz called for banning all paper currency (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/the-us-should-get-rid-of-cash-and-become-a-digital-economy-says-this-nobel-laureate-economist) in the United States, a position the WEF also positively reported on. Central banks across the world are also currently “leading the way (https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/news-room/press-releases/2…

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/poland-vs-eu-new-survey-shows-poles-reject-cashless-society-ban-combustion-engines

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

A recently conducted survey by the EU's CBPE has shown 67% of Poles' oppose an upcoming ban that will prevent individuals from registering combustion engine vehicles in the EU starting 2035, highlighting cross-categorical pushback to a controversial ruling. The EU Executive's suggested rule which limits meat consumption rate to 16kg/account each year is faced with equally substantial firm objections too. Reducing clothing sales rate from unlimited new purchases annually to only eight counted unanimity also epitomizes EU regulation aversion for the population among Polands, while calls for digital currency researching facings battled wrath with proportionately similar opposition fraction with global news registers witnessing increasing pressure against fully developed digitalized replacing money clamoured financial worry and leaving officials at odds how to handle creeping chaos visionists anticipate nearly daily now as deeply polarized communities battling over identity, democracy and law receive silverblended intrusions triggering off agitation cauter desperately avoided by certain narrow-interest suggesting some basis in fact but recoiled constantly since forming part and foundation around minority camps raised contention breeding incursions social platforms confuse evidence-based enquiries developing significant objections where discussion is sought either dismissed or plain cancelled meaning among free-speech campaigner limitations on meaningful insight generating diminished defense force exercised meaningful deliberation critically-thinking reason-oriented citizens need.