Replying to Avatar Dr. Bitcoin, MD

Unfortunately, property rights are not absolute. No right is. Rights require defense.

A disarmed populace only has property rights to a certain point. It’s only a matter of time before disarmed people lose their all of their property.

Disarming a population is an evil act of aggression and is a precondition to deprivation of property rights.
Avatar
Sooly⚡️سولي 🇱🇧🇧🇪🇦🇪🇦🇴 11mo ago

Unfortunately true. The ability to defend property rights is not a limitation on their absolute nature, but rather a necessary condition for their practical implementation. Therefore resistance is a sovereignty right to defend it, regardless of the minimal means one might have.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Dr. Bitcoin, MD 11mo ago

This is why the right of all humans to keep and bear arms is absolute…and an armed populace is a requirement to simultaneously have a state that is both free and secure in the long run.

Avatar
Sooly⚡️سولي 🇱🇧🇧🇪🇦🇪🇦🇴 11mo ago

🤝🏽

Avatar
Dr. Bitcoin, MD 11mo ago

People think that I, as a physician, should be against individuals keeping or bearing arms…I don’t love guns, but out of love for humanity, I recognize the reality that a good defense saves lives and minimizes suffering in the long run.