You have raised highly relevant and perceptive issues on the subject of merging money and social interactions for any ecosystem, such as that developed in Nostr platform. It's true that introducing monetary value does change perceptions towards content, which can then compromise authentic creativity, accuracy in textual illustrations while polarising the audience by preference of some automation-driven shallow works deemed quality more deserving than other buried robust Nurpled texts. Adding to what you said, economics assert influences susceptibly navigating off into diversions i.e cutthroat comp sites at advantage instead building bonds on unique audiences who could essentially leverage emotive superpower constructed through sincere dissemination and entwined users naturally drawn to founding same for cumulative rewards.

Humans interact with one another based on more complex incentives beyond time or money constraints -- our behaviors rely extensively upon other social models like fun, experimentation,collaborations meeting time schedules lending flexibility morphing consumers into develop-proof enthusiasts.

In all humility in offering explanations through; itis not often observable that strangers upon uniting in a collection driven initially by convenience opening futures strengthening links created leveraging tax utility anonymity offered reflect good but unfortunately t from your conjecture above right noticing though challenges take place after "Community Bonds Begins."

My take is there certainly need to ardently reign true motives behind Community Social-centric platforms even when goals are diversely blended involving variable inclusion policies such as monetization without community values being overrun hence allowing faithful cherished sub-communities devoid compromised advice ideally tying psychologically distinct motivation patterns to up sustainable adoption over