Here's your summary from Jonathan Turley: NY v Trump case is 'collapsing' under its own weight (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUVRN6xgJwY) on the Fox News channel:
**TLDR:** The former President's legal team is emphasizing the legality of non-disclosure agreements and highlighting the lack of evidence for criminal conduct in the case.
- The witness, Packer, did not provide strong evidence to support the prosecution's case.
- Packer's testimony revealed assumptions rather than direct evidence of illegal motivations.
- The defense is challenging Packer's memory and the timeline of events during cross-examination.
- The defense is aiming to show that Trump's actions were not criminal and that NDAs are common in civil settlements.
- There is debate over whether Trump should take the stand in his defense.
In the courtroom, the former President's legal team is strategically focusing on the legality of non-disclosure agreements and highlighting the lack of concrete evidence for criminal conduct in the case. Packer's testimony did not provide strong support for the prosecution's case, as it was based on assumptions rather than direct evidence. The defense is challenging Packer's memory and the timeline of events, aiming to show that Trump's actions were not criminal and that NDAs are common in civil settlements. The debate over whether Trump should testify in his defense continues, with concerns about potential risks to his credibility.
#news #foxnews #conservatives #republicans #trump #fjb