Nostr Web Client

I see it similarly to Linux Distros, use Core (compare it to Debian) and from there, various flavors are made. Most security related patches should always go upstream to Core and disseminate from there. Soft forks are bit of a pain points atm, Core has said they're not dealing with soft forks anymore, consensus has to be found elsewhere. So we've been trying to figure that out for the last few years

BTC_P2P 1y ago

Interesting, I didn’t know Core wasn’t messing with soft forks anymore.

So there is an opening for a group of devs to implement new consensus changes post-core. Could be called Bitcoin-mantle!

Is anyone working on filling this market need other than nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk ? Maybe nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m nostr:npub10pensatlcfwktnvjjw2dtem38n6rvw8g6fv73h84cuacxn4c28eqyfn34f and others could work on setting something up?

It’d be righteous to see some of these upgrades get off the ground and into main net so #Bitcoin can work towards scaling further. I’ll update my node. #CTV #APO #TXHASH #CSFS #OP_VAULT

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

f7a8be33... 1y ago

It's not about the software itself. If the market was ready for it, it'd be ready in a week. The problem is the market needs to learn what it desires.

BTC_P2P 1y ago

Well this lil conversation is a tiny signal that the market is starting to demand something like a post-core repository where new scaling (and anti-spam) upgrades can be found and experimented with.