Replying to Avatar Zach

Nope. Having a document as a backbone is an important element of stability.

Lately I see the same in BTC arguments about block size or high fees. That not changing the protocol on a whim is a strength. For a government’s constitution it’s the same.
69
Account deleted 2y ago

Glad someone brought BTC up. Indeed we have agreed on a constitution. Change is possible but there are core aspects that have become non negotiable.

Having a core set of rules does not mean the rules are good though. We could stick to FIAT… why invent new core rules with BTC?

I agree. The idea of a set of core rules designed to provide stability is essential.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.