Love what nostr:npub1xnf02f60r9v0e5kty33a404dm79zr7z2eepyrk5gsq3m7pwvsz2sazlpr5 and those other wallets are doing to simplify channel management! But won’t it still result in small UTXO set when user wants to move the funds to layer 1 and they close the channels? What’s the solution for using layer 2 noncustodial but merging to large utxo set when ready for layer 1?
Agreed although most payments are layer 2 which is why non custodian wallets like nostr:npub1xnf02f60r9v0e5kty33a404dm79zr7z2eepyrk5gsq3m7pwvsz2sazlpr5 have the right idea
Discussion
IMO when the traffic becomes that backed up on layer 1 leaving layer 2 for 1 wouldn’t be the case most likely the opposite the management of channels and fees change constantly… I do see where your coming from, we are almost there.. curious to see what changes or new layers that come from this