Replying to Avatar Base58⛓🔓

nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a asked a great question yesterday: why no temporary softforks?

Here's Base58's niftynei on the difficulty with adding opcodes to bitcoin

https://m.primal.net/HTwk.mp4

Well, the rule could take into account the block number the transaction was confirmed in. However, it still has many problems:

- the handling code cannot be removed

- if someone doesn't get their tx into the chain fast enough, they lose

- incentivizes miners to reorg

It could have some more, that's just what I came up with now.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.