This actually works. Holy fuck.

About <5 seconds from spam being published to it being marked as NSFW by this bot. Try it out 👀

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqxd9rf39pnxm5xkx3z0ujcxltu3hl5qxl8mgatqc8k068jdva77cqy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcqypfqqazqu4ttq78du8gsfr9k37au8ekl208zqu2sfau46s0wy54z2jwdhkn

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s when support for reports?

support in what sense? censorship via friend reports? this has been a tricky thing to implement without pissing people off

Support for adding moderation services like this. You could have a dedicated list for these, and have actions configured based off of the type of flag. (blur media, mark as spam/hide, ignore)

There can be services dedicated to scanning content and aggregating reports

I think a relay based model may work better.

MOD-REQ and MOD-RES

This skips the overhead of signatures for each moderated event, and moderation may not be instant (so servers can wait a bit before responding).

And you can for example blur media or hide events while within the timeout.

Types of flags are specified in NIP-11.

So you made the gay porn bots so you could eventually monetize your filter bot? 😂

I approve. 💜