Rough estimates seem to be about 100M Premium users out of 2.49B total.

Roughly 4%?

So ~96% of YouTube users are unwilling to pay for the service to avoid the ad model.

A percentage of those (I found about 11% - or more than double the number of Premium subscribers - lol) aren't even willing to deal with the ads on to pay for their use. They just want to pay nothing.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see #Nostr replacing YouTube without using the same models *today* in the current culture. The best case I see would be an ad model that's more transparent.

nostr:nevent1qqs2f38ekakaa40wdy69lfw7490mjurzvf4rvlkea0wjxzdjrnw29dcpz3mhxw309ucnydewxqhrqt338g6rsd3e9upzpl4psmp2geudh3phwp8w6gtqs3hg57q7t7chq4hfhvenssx4hhhjqvzqqqqqqyfvdrwt

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

There's probably something relevant here for Nostr in general. I only pay for one of my relays, and it's a stupid low amount. Most of the network that already exists seems to be mostly charity. Charity will run dry really fast at the costs involved with something like video hosting. It may work for a super niche group (like us), but global YouTube levels? Not seeing it. I want to. But I don't. Even if we do it, content diversity will be so low that most of us still use YT anyway.

nostr:nevent1qqsw6t9ssm95e79283rfuegepujun20m7dmphg5mhaxppjnaag2mhncpz3mhxw309ucnydewxqhrqt338g6rsd3e9upzpl4psmp2geudh3phwp8w6gtqs3hg57q7t7chq4hfhvenssx4hhhjqvzqqqqqqyxyr2vc