No humans necessary.
Discussion
Worlds first
Ya right
āOur system relies only on ātrusted news sourcesāā
Lmao. lol.
Thatās basically admitting this is not based on all the data available but selectively screened for ātrustedā sources.
Yep. Theyāre just coding in appeal to authority. CNN, BBC, and the New York Times are flagged as ātrustedā Iām sure
š¤”š¤”
This is the digital age. There is no objective truth in media. Just which side of the uniparty narrative coin youāre looking at
Downaide: Robots control passively-consumed news information.
Upside: The algorithm learns how not to make it look like the obvious propaganda that journalists pooped out regularly
This is as much propaganda as what sci fi writers were warning us about
This *looks like* a really great idea.
But in the current state of the world it is probably next to useless. "Trusted sources?" give me a break.
Now it is possible for AI to "divine" the actual news from these sketchy CIA-fed "trusted sources" and to "unspin" all the weasel words, the Russell conjugates, etc... to give us just the facts, without the most important ones buried at the bottom. That is how A.I. can fix the news. Not by generating avatars of humans.
Even better as A.I. improves and can fact check things like "hey, airplane fuel can't melt steel so we think something else is going on" or "building 7 didn't come down like that, it came down like this, and so the trusted sources are lying again". That would be valuable. But there is so much "value" in corrupting the news that I don't know how to preserve the actual value of uncorrupted A.I. news without (you guessed it) writing the code myself.
Don't trust. Verify
Regular news is boring. This is no better.
nostr:npub1agxyjp32qdp794vpg7rpntxktpny4zpuv59xee53tflupvpjssqsxg42dj