the need to restore the constitution

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

the FDA and the National institution for Health

are by the plain reading of the Constitution unconstitutional

Hamilton would say, 'no, no… it’s for the general welfare'

that's Alexander Hamilton argument

and that's a powerful source

and you can do whatever is for the general welfare

well, if that's true

what limits are there?

why did they put a list of things the federal GOVT can do?

you don’t want people starving in the streets

you dont’ want the Grand Canyon filled full of sewage

you don't want smog to obscure the Grand Tetons

you want to be able to drive across the country

the federal GOVT built those highways

i wish they’d maintain them better

so, what about that?

it’s hard to make the case for a limited GOVT

so, let’s talk about BIG GOVT

let’s make the case for it

do you think there needs to be an FDA?

( Food and Drug Administration )

yes... no?

and it’s NOT in the Constitution

EPA?

well, if you say no, you don’t care if the environment gets rapped

you just don't want people getting hurt

do you think there should be a national institute for health?

by now is primary research oriented

private corporation could do that more efficiently, do you agree?

do we need the FDA?

do you believe in the FDA?

if yes….

well, is NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION

for most of the history of the US

the GOVT was about 10% of the economy

most of it stayed in local not federal

and now if you count the cost of the regulatory state

is more than a half of the economy

the numbers of laws made in the Congress

has not really increased significantly in 100 years

Congress still works kind of the way it always worked

the point is:

the GOVT’s gotten really BIG

and some of the arguments for that are the ones i just named

there are crying needs

it’s one country

environmental harm goes over borders--

smog and stuff like that….

so there are arguments that there are crying public needs

and the GOVT should address them

do you think there is flexibility in the Constitution to meet that argument?

i think public needs and how that fits into the Constitution

is related to the debate that goes back to James Madison vs Alexander Hamilton and the interpretation of the Constitution

e.g. they debated over whether or not the general welfare phrase in the Constitution was an extra power that was given to the GOVT

or whether or not it was a summary of the previously named powers

there’s an Article 1, Section 8 where the Constitution says, roughly

that it can tax and spend ( i think it says ) for the general welfare

James Madison actually argues that that clause was badly written

bc what they had in mind was that they could tax and spend to pay off the debts that the state had incurred in the Revolution, as long as those debts were incurred in the general cause of winning the Revolutionary War

Hamilton read it as we can do more stuff

Madison’s counter to that was, why do we have a list then of things we can do?

why is it, say, you can do these things, if you can also do anything else that promotes the general welfare?

how does that make any sense?

in the case of an epidemic or a pandemic?

you’d have to fight that nationally somehow…

you could do that by cooperation among the states…

and even worldwide GOVT

cooperation among the nations…

think about COVID’19

we already have experienced

so there is a potential argument…

you’re gonna build up this GOVT

and it’s gonna be supreme for Int’l purposes

but only for they

almost all laws are made in a different way than they used to be made

most of the laws, the great majority ( 90% ) are not made in the Congress anymore

they’re made in these regulatory agencies

but in almost all cases, these regulatory agencies also enforce these laws and they also hear disputes that arise under these regulations they pass

so the 3 branches of GOVT are united in the single hands, as they are in the hands of the maker, of the creator, in the declaration of independence.

that’s a PROBLEM

that FORM is a PROBLEM

so when you have hundreds of lawmaking bodies, as we do now, then they start making these really technical, complex wrought laws

and nobody knows what they are

its’ so large now that it becomes a factor in the politics of the country, sort of as a separate interest

the GOVT is a separate interest now

and that is a PROBLEM

what are you going to do about that problem?

btw. it's a BIG PROBLEM

do we need a different kind of GOVT?

does the Founders’ Constitution enable the American people—by means of its system of representative government—to meet the new and pressing problems of today without compromising fundamental principles?

BITCOIN will solve America's debt

( based on that argument )