#Heliocentrism

https://blossom.primal.net/d77490042d109be2bdc18fd8dfc205f58036f0dc5dfc16ae74c387f8188e5c4e.3gp

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

hey Ben, I am just curious - what is your explanation of tides?

No one knows what causes the tides. We only know sea level (as in orientation) is caused by the earth moving upwards which debunks the globe model. This means level is the same for everyone on earth.

well..wedo know why... its called gravity

Gravity is just an (unproven) theory. Problems with gravity are 1)no signs of acceleration when objects dropped and 2) downward force and upward force (bouancy) at the same time.. 3) you can see the gradient from the earth's upward motion - see this video and test for yourself - bouancy always shows the direction of a force/motion https://video.nostr.build/50da1368d9d509b3c988be48f093a5e71297c06516de2be68375f8899f0671d3.mp4

yea, thats a thing called inertia... did the water, that shot up not fall back down? πŸ™‚

When the water reached the ground the water is then "accelerated" in the direction of the force and is displaced. You can then see water being more dense than air moves closer to the source of the force giving you a water "level".

Real science doesn't require trust - test this for yourself

https://video.nostr.build/bbf1881ccc1a36e93c77dd91520e39eec48bcc83460f3939235ebec17588e9e3.mp4

inertia of mass of the air?

this is all broken by an inconvenient thing called the inverse square rule, which operates all the way down to the subatomic. this dictates that spheres and pi are the centre of the math of physics which violates the whole basis of flat earth bullshit.

I just debunked the flat earth above.. We live on a level (orientation) plane where up is singular, not relative. Unless you can prove otherwise? The chatgpt link is here, compare it to your model.

Hmmm we disagree on this on, I do not believe we're moving up. It all just comes down to density/buoyancy IMO

Density and buoyancy require a force - they don't exist on their own. Buoyancy is showing you the direction of the force. You can test and verify this for yourself.

The earth is moving upwards to meet objects when let go - you can see this in the video - free fall water stops flowing as disconnected from the upward moving earth. Objects are inanimate unless a force (motion) is applied.

Density and buoyancy are the general explanation provided by FE proponents, but I don't think it's complete.

Electrostatic charge is the primary factor IMO.

Everyone has heard of magnets, almost no one has heard of electrets, which are similar to magnets but instead of a magnetic charge, they hold a permanent static charge.

Things falling down is the natural bias of seeking the universes default state - rest. Rest, ground, counterspace - all synonyms for the same thing. Gravity is an effect of these forces; forces are fields which are aether disturbance modalities, and gravity is an "anti-force". How it is describe depends on the framework one looks at it through.

The ying/yang of the 1/phi ratio represented throughout all of nature. Self similarity, always express in one direction or another, always using the same golden ratio. That's what I interpret "being made in the image of God" to mean.

Stationary earthers and globe earthers require an imaginary force for their models to work. There is no proof of acceleration when objects are dropped, which proves they are not "falling". There is no "pulling" force, only push.

Trust me, I get it, because I was there not too long ago myself.

It can take months to get through the "Flat-earthers are obviously crazy people!" stage.

No lie has been conditioned more deeply into us; they literally showed us a spinning globe on the teacher's desk and taught us heliocentrism FIRST THING the moment we walked into government school as preschoolers/kindergarteners.

The persistence of this messaging runs deep into our childhood by design.

But once you are readyβ€”and have hit your threshold on other "fundamental truths" of your worldview turning out to be complete liesβ€”all you have to do is ask the following question:

"Does it actually make sense that we are on a spinning ball corkscrewing in 6 different directions at millions of miles per hour....yet the North Star has stayed in the EXACT SAME place, and the star constellations have remained the EXACT SAME for 6,000+ years of verifiable recorded history?"

You can dig through bigger questions later. For now, just ponder this one for as long as you need.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqqqcklhr87e98ppk88rzu2f0a3cq56df8vywud6vt0dfw8ym89tyqqsq7k2s2gcdv84au2ary90e2ftq505ns73r2t4rpecwvfqywj39g6skgnk22