Nostr Web Client

The Catfish Effect: How Tesla Supercharged China’s EV Industry—And Paid the Price

The “Catfish Effect” is a concept from the fishing industry that illustrates a simple truth: competition keeps systems alive. Sardines in a tank grow lethargic and die if left alone. But toss in a catfish—a natural predator—and suddenly the sardines start swimming harder, staying alert, and surviving longer. This metaphor has profound geopolitical relevance, especially when examining how China uses foreign companies like Tesla to stir its industrial waters.

A Pattern Written in Pain

China has learned through painful history what happens when it isolates itself technologically. In the 19th century, the British navy crushed Chinese forces during the Opium Wars. Later, Japan—once seen as a cultural peer—industrialized rapidly and defeated China in the First Sino-Japanese War. Both defeats revealed a fundamental truth: nations that fall behind in technology become vulnerable to exploitation, conquest, or collapse.

From these hard lessons, a pattern emerged: China must let technology in—but only just enough, and only temporarily.

Controlled Exposure

China doesn’t embrace foreign technology with open arms. It lets it in with surgical precision. Foreign companies are granted access only when they serve a domestic strategic interest. The intent is not partnership but absorption: learn from the outsider, replicate its strengths, then outcompete or discard it.

No modern example captures this better than Tesla.

Tesla: The Catfish in China’s EV Tank

When Tesla was allowed to build a wholly-owned factory in Shanghai in 2018—breaking from China's usual joint-venture requirement—it looked like a rare diplomatic and economic win for an American company. Tesla’s Gigafactory quickly became one of its most productive facilities. Chinese buyers flocked to the brand. For a time, Tesla became China’s second-largest EV seller.

But China had a longer game in mind.

Tesla brought with it advanced production technologies:

Giga Casting: A revolutionary way to cast large vehicle parts in single pieces.

Camera-Based Autopilot: A software-first approach to driving automation.

Battery Innovation: High-density cells and new configurations.

Tesla also sourced many parts from local Chinese suppliers. These companies learned on the job—by building to Tesla’s specs. Once they knew how to produce these components, they could sell them to anyone, especially Tesla’s emerging Chinese rivals.

The Flip: From Learning to Leading

Fast forward to today: Tesla has fallen well down the list in China’s EV market. Companies like BYD, XPeng, and NIO have not only caught up—they’re aggressively expanding abroad. Tesla’s catfish effect worked—but not in its favor. It stirred the tank, accelerated competition, and now swims in a far more hostile sea.

The Broader Play: From Factory Floor to Battlefield

This strategy doesn’t stop at electric cars. China has used the same controlled-exposure model across sectors: aerospace, telecommunications, AI, and semiconductors. The goal is never just commercial dominance—it’s comprehensive capability.

Civilian tech once learned can be redirected for military use. Industrial gains become strategic leverage. Foreign companies, thinking they’ve won access to a vast market, are often just the catfish—brought in to wake up the local players before being sidelined.

Conclusion: Stop Feeding the Tank

The Catfish Effect is not a coincidence or a market quirk. It’s industrial policy. It’s geopolitical strategy. And it works.

China invites disruption to spark innovation, harvests the resulting know-how, and then tilts the field to favor its own. Tesla is just the latest example. It won’t be the last.