Ah so your only rebuttal is I'm dumb, very helpful for a debate : ) Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
Looks like you pretty clearly have zero rebuttal to my reply and are simply resorting to ad hominems now, sad.
You obviously never understand bitcoin, but hey best of luck trying to change how people use bitcoin 😄
> I simply think contentious code changes and spam are bad for bitcoin.
Contentious is subjective.
> And of course you can force things on people,
Not in bitcoin.
> bitcoin isn't some utopia
No it's just software you can voluntarily run, or not.
> if blocks have child porn
Then there's no more you can do about it then remove it from TOR, which you can't. This is what decentralized censorship-resistant means, it means it is not only money for you, but money for your enemies.
> ETH 2.0
I can tell you're not a dev, bitcoin and eth have almost nothing in common, there is no EVM on bitcoin, there will never be first class tokens on bitcoin, there will always be POW in bitcoin.
> Dude the fact that you don't even prioritize bitcoin as money
Of course I do, hence why I'm for the CTV upgrade. I also technically understand that bitcoin is, in other words it will be whatever it will be, I have no control over that.
> Seriously why don't you just go be an ETH bro?
Because eth is trash.
> If youre so sold on putting all kinds of scripts and garbage on bitcoin
No there's already scripts and garbage on it, I'm simply advocating to make the scripts more efficient in order to make bitcoin a better money.
It seems you have ALOT of research to do and simply buy into simple narratives on social media. Maybe learn to code so you don't have to trust clueless clowns?
What? No there's only one maintainer which is Luke who force pushes his changes straight to master with 0 review.
I'm not pushing anything, I simply think CTV is good for bitcoin, there is no way to force changes in bitcoin, you understand this right? Also I don't need to trust anyone because I can read the fucking code.
Don't worry the hype will wear down and people will run software that is not maintained by a single person, that's the real joke, is that people are running knots at all. Best of luck.
CTV has nothing to do with jpgs, but you can keep your garbage software that luke pushes straight to master with zero other contributors.
Oh, and is this what you mean by "exploding"?
Yah best of luck telling people how to use their bitcoin on a decentralized censorship resistant network.
Yes the white paper is not gospel, there were many mistakes as well as many anticipations that didn't pan out. It's not gospel you complete newb.
No CTV is not being rushed despite what non technical folks like samson and others will have you believe.
CTV was assigned a BIP all the way back in 2020 and still has a 5BTC bug bounty for anyone that can actually find any bugs in it.
CSFS discussion started all the way back in 2018.
Truth always defeats FUD.
No, it's a peer to peer information system, the best usecase happens to be money, maybe look up what the hell censorship resistant actually means.
*permission-less
Apparently you never had any idea what permissions and decentralized actually meant.
Hilarious watching Samson try to argue with developers, just keeps getting ratioed over and over again.
Long before the terms "crypto bros" or "suit coiners" were coined (pre-ICO/DEFI/NFT/MSTR) there were real bitcoiners telling you to only buy bitcoin.
Bitcoin has since grown immensely but the real ones are easy to spot, they'll still only ever recommend you buy bitcoin.
Read my OP again lol, it's just him.
Hey the more implementations the better but I think I'll stick to the implementation that doesn't have a single dev pushing changes only peer reviewed by himself straight to master, but to each their own :)
lol, typical bcasher projection statement with no basis in reality
lol I assure you wicked is no fixthefilter person, he's much smarter than that, we are very much aligned in our views on op return and agree with him that most of the fixthefilter people would have been bcashers