Avatar
Augustus Cato
0a9572664b1e9e368f72603f4b1d2461ff601f2613a9bb58d1061c0c7345f17a

If Russia took the Donbas region from Ukraine in 2014 without bloodshed, what's the point in saying that they have made advances in that region when they've already been controlling it for over 10 years?

If that's all Russia has to show for such a costly war, would it be wrong to say they haven't really 'won' the war?

Replying to Avatar Peter Todd

Ukrainians (most likely) assassinated a Russian Major General at his home near Moscow yesterday, yet another in a long list of assassinations of Russians (e.g. the EW warfare expert, Yevgeny Rytikov, killed with a car bomb earlier this week).

https://video.nostr.build/704010ad864830f584cc6608ec58e537e07921e56cc3fbc00819feab058d20a9.mp4

One interesting detail: the assassination seems to have been done with an IED made of grenades planted in car they parked on the street outside his apartment, probably triggered remotely with a webcam. Not all of the grenades exploded at once, which meant that after the first explosion, additional secondaries kept on happening.

Now think about it: suppose the general had only been wounded, not killed. A stream of secondary explosions would discourage anyone from getting close enough to help, maximizing the chances they he does in fact die. Smart.

https://video.nostr.build/88fb9144d589a0ad281008e25cc23f323022c509a9e16f7a2fbc94e422adf010.mp4

Russia does follow-up "double-tap" air strikes all the time on Ukrainian civilians to try to kill rescue crews. Using a similar tactic on Russia for assassinations is more than fair.

Death by I.E.D in Europe. Now that's something I never thought would happen.

So many questions.. 😅

(Audio ON 🔊)

https://v.nostr.build/P3mdKa11FMt8gTgM.mp4

"I believed in your nuts Jimmy!" 😂🤣

#weirdstr #bullishnuts #bullishbounty

The US is very anxious about nuclear proliferation. Plus the regime in Iran has supported gangs/militias/terrorists that have attacked Americans for 45+ years.

The regime has also shown in its actions. and devotion to its political ideology ,that it cannot be trusted by its own people let alone its neighbours.

To allow them to have nuclear weapons is a dangerous gamble.

You fight regimes with everything that's available- bribes, bombs, books etc.

Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan are very different to Iran. For one Vietnam was all about sending a message to its allies that the US is willing to fight communism. Afghanistan is a fractured tribal society that is missing a "king" that was traditionally the center of their society. Iraq was destroyed mostly by the combined actions of Sadaam and the current regime in Iran more than anything else.

Putin and the Russia government don't think China will be a reliable customer for its oil compared to Europe. It is unlikely that China will even pay full price for the oil.

On the other side a bombing campaign of that sort would be devastating for Iran and a potentially fatal to the regime. Plus the added benefit for the US is that reduces some of China's oil supply for a little bit.

Oil refineries, power plants, drone factories, nuclear facilities, chemical research sites, navy buildings, ports, IRGC sites and the occasional innocent bystander.

Replying to Avatar Peter Todd

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2025/03/27/the-triple-tap-raid-on-the-engels-bomber-base-cost-russia-96-billion/

$960 million worth of equipment destroyed, so 0.7% if Russia's entire (official) military budget lost in a single set of attacks.

In fairness, getting to the point where Ukraine could repeatedly hit of Russia's biggest and more important airbases certainly took a lot of preparation destroying anti-air systems between Ukraine and that airbase. But still, impressive.

Imagine if Ukraine was also able to hit the production supply chain for that equipment.