Just saw this in my notifications.
A few thoughts...
-Do you mean entities that sent me bitcoin in the past, whirlpool participants, or both?
-I'm not worried about the tx0 being briefly known before it is mixed (not connected to my identity), buying KYC free makes it irrelevant if I'm only going to spend on the other side of a mix.
-To my knowledge, another big thing lacking from Wasabi that would make it a more robust protocol is postmix spending tools and paynyms
I want to caveat that I would never use Wasabi even if they had a superior method (imo they don't if you are remixing. As a single mix, I can maybe see your argument in isolation possibly). If they are going to censor inputs and work with chain analysis companies that already disqualifies them as a privacy tool. If they hadn't taken that stance, I might be more open to their new implementation.
To attempt fighting my bias, I'll leave you with this short article by Shinobi. He makes a measured criticism of both of us:
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/technical/wasabi-vs-samourai-for-bitcoin-mixing
You can also adopt good practices and mix in whirlpool utxo by utxo to avoid consolidating. He is just saying that tx0 in fact could force one more consolidation transaction if you are not careful. But it’s exactly the same for Wasabi users who certainly consolidate their utxo in order to fund their premix Wasabi wallet, and then start the mixing round.
No it’s the State. Without the nanny State and its monopolies over a bunch of essential services, no legal tender, no Fed, no central banks, no planification of the economy, no socialism.
Basically everything could be solved on earth within a couple of years by the free market
FYI the nostrgram.nows link seems to still be the most reliable compared to .build.
More fluid, pages load faster and never get stuck etc...even if I think there has been some improvements for the .build compared to few days ago.
I'm using brave browser
#[2] is on fire lately. Or maybe he always has been
Will try tomorrow but now GN
I added this suggestion directly to Mullvad github. https://github.com/mullvad/mullvadvpn-app/issues/4435
Mockup below:
⚡️
Rather than a new "Bitcoin Lightning" payment method they could just use BTCPay server and let the customer choose how to pay but well done for the nicely formulated proposition
I don’t think bug reports are a problem, they certainly are useful for Will and any devs in general. It’s rather how you report them I suspect.
People complaining of a free service developed by people who don’t make any money on it are not helping anything.
I often read that you can pay for Mullvad VPN with lightning but AFAIK they only let me choose on-chain which is ok for me, but do they actually take Lightning payments ?
Plebs are buying the dip on #[0] , no fear, only conviction.
1,7 BTC volume in the last 24h (think it's a record or almost), 3 times more BUY orders than SELL ones.
And the sellers add huge premiums (bigger than ususal) in their orders, so they basically do arbitrage trades
No plebs want to sell at this ridiculous prices
Yes it's been like this for few days, since one of the past update
I often have to refresh the page for nostrgram to work properly
No it was a figure of speech meaning that even with easy monetization without intermidiary allowed by nostr, their is still challenges to face. Like the data hosting service providers which are not native to Nostr
Influencers expecte a constant availability of their content which they get through YouTube etc..... But it is a bit more complicated if you choose to opt out of these platforms which provid a real service to influencers actually
So basically the shift is not easy at all
Thanks for the SATs anyway 😆