In this context, it occurs to me that I find the French word avant-garde very well fitting.
The goal must be a political system that is flat and decentralized in its structures, but at the same time defensible, based on a new money. The big question is how the transition should be structured. If it is not planned, there is the old danger: old wine in new bottles, or the (old) wolf in sheep's clothing. no gain
very curious how and when all this will play out
Rune, looking up for your thoughts.
One thing; I have seen this argument ("
First, history demonstrates that you don't need many people to change society for the better.") often and in fact I like it on first glance.
But.
It's mostly about violent change, one or the other way.
What one could ask is: if our stateship / political system was mostly given birth via a Constituent Assembly, it needed more than a few people.
So, if it's done peacefully and in due process you will need more than a few.
And, yes, it's naive to expect anything from the masses. And, yes the freerider 40% are a real problem for any progress. They will "defect" when they have nothing left to lose.
Again, what's needed on the societal layer is a "sly, roundabout way".
it is virtually impossible not to make pronunciation errors with proper names
just kidding ;)
could we please develop an AI supported proper name pronunciation APP for all the particularly linguistically gifted podcasters of this world (i.e. only for nostr:nprofile1qqsywt6ypu57lxtwj2scdwxnyrl3sry9typcstje65x7rw9a2e5nq8sprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctvqydhwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnzd96xxmmfdecxzunt9e3k7mgpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mq9hxafw) that completely deletes and replaces his pronunciation from the audio track?!
"If you don't police your platform, we are ging to hold you accountable."
If you don't dismiss your fiat-money system, we are going to ignore it peacefully.
and more to come
Wer regiert hier eigentlich wen ?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=tbbL5xhmquKSOaxV&v=Z9tTHKzUa7s&feature=youtu.be
Apollo News: Ein Meister der Repression und eine einsame Opposition
'In Venezuela scheint es Maduro erneut zu gelingen, die Macht gegen alle demokratischen Prinzipien zu halten. Dahinter steht ein brutales Repressionssystem, das der sozialistische Diktator gut beherrscht. Die Opposition bleibt einsam und die US-Regierung passiv.'
https://apollo-news.net/ein-meister-der-repression-und-eine-einsame-opposition/
Warum ist Apollo News nicht auf Nostr?
Warum kann der Leser nur in Fiat spenden?
"Grants, Stocks, Bonds, and Other Ways to Contribute"
hm
Max Liebermann was known for his spartanly furnished studio in his villa on Wannsee.

Even less furnishings than Jack's.

"this is one of the biggest stories in the world and nobody is talking about it."
"for a hundred years we had a system, that the world had to use, becouse the technology wasn´t there to do it any ohter way. Now the technology is here. ... our system is almost ... finished."
The BRICS trading system is already wiping out US farmers, as global price discovery is destroyed... https://youtu.be/z7m5Z6FuPbk via @YouTube
"we are flying blind."
Instead of organizing a bretton Woods 3.0, the USA chose confrontation.
He who sows the wind will reap the whirlwind.
this guy is obviously very familiar with the facts, that matter.
URGENT: PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY COMMUNICATION RIGHT NOW!
on 4th Sept 2024 #ChatControl regulation representatives of EU goverments will resume work based on a secret document according to Patrick #Breyer, former Member of the European Parliament.
Help to mobilize everybody to defend our #privacy of communication and its developers, investors!
If no preventive actions from your side now, this regulation will be endorsed on 12/13 December 2024.
According to the draft regulation dated 28 May (Council document 9093/24), ChatControl deploys to do, for instance:
🔻 “upload moderation”, users of apps and services with chat functions are to be asked whether they accept the indiscriminate and error-prone scanning and possibly reporting of their privately shared images, photos and videos.
🔻Scan by “artificial intelligence” technology previously unknown images and videos;
🔻If a user refuses the scanning, they would be blocked from sending or receiving images, photos, videos and links (Article 10).
🔻End-to-end encrypted services such as Whatsapp or Signal would have to implement the automated searches “prior to transmission” of a message (so-called client-side scanning, Article 10a).
During the last discussion on 24 May, the Council Legal Service made it clear that indiscriminate chat control scanning of non-suspects is still envisioned and remains a violation of fundamental rights.
Nevertheless, most EU governments are determined to go ahead. https://netzpolitik.org/wp-upload/2024/05/2024-05-28_Council_Presidency_LEWP_CSAR_Compromise-texts_9093.pdf
🌎 Tell your goverment and parliamentarians, that the proposal should be rejected altogether!
🔴Is your government in favour?
→ Ask for an explanation and for your government to revert its course.
🟡Is your government abstaining?
→ Ask why and demand that they take a strong stance against chat control.
🟢Is your government opposing?
→ Great, but take a closer look at the reasoning: Some governments like #Germany e.g. only object to the scanning of encrypted communications, but are fine with the indiscriminate scanning of other private and public communication, with the end of anonymous communication by requiring age verification, or with introducing a minimum age for “risky” communication apps. Also critical governments need to do more, exert their influence in the Council of the EU and agree on a joint list of necessary fundamental changes to the proposal. Absent such revision they should ask the European Commission to withdraw the chat control proposal as it stands.
🔴 In favour of ChatControl: France, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden.
🟡Abstained: Estonia, Netherlands, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Austria
🟢 Opposed the proposal: Germany, Poland
When reaching out to your government, the ministries of the interior (in the lead) of justice and of digitisation/telecommunications/economy are your best bet. You can additionally contact the permanent representation of your country with the EU: https://op.europa.eu/en/web/who-is-who/organization/-/organization/COREPER/
Why is the active German judge Patrick #Breyer not telling us this himself, on this platform?
He prefers Mastodon?
Another MEP is Christine Anderson.
Listen what she has to say about her workplace, a lawyer herself.
Lyudmyla, pls ask yourself the question, whether the EU institutions might be totally rigged. If yes, do you really believe that anything can be radically improved from within.
Try chat-control on nostr ...
Perhaps every nostr user (with a broad impact) should have a second, third ... ego on other platforms, just be mirrored there. (Ditto ?). Radiance.

