Crimea, USSR - February, 1945.
Alles für den Machterhalt. Auch, wenn man dafür unkonventionelle Methoden benötigt. So macht das alles Sinn. Olaf hat schliesslich als Jungsozialist sein Handwerk von der Pike auf gelernt. Mit besten Kontakten zur kommunistischen Parteiführung der SED der ehemaligen DDR. ✊
#Landtagswahlen
#sachsen #thüringen 💙 
https://video.nostr.build/8d5adfd8900af2839d82b185ba56fb2be2eb2ae0d7eea07eb86c20fc16ee92e7.mp4
#n-Bach-runter
Big Ben, so you agree on "being locked out" !?
that's sth for now
Meinungsfreiheit
Die Grenze ist das Strafrecht.
Nicht die Zensur.
Gentes, não temos um CEO. Sinta-se melhor do que em casa!
German party Die Linke just filed a formal inquiry into the use of blockchain surveillance software with the German government.
It wants to know the government's minimum requirements for error rates and verifiability of the software used. It directly references the use of Chainalysis Reactor, the accuracy of which was recently questioned in the trial of alleged Bitcoin Fog operator Roman Sterlingov. Die Linke states that:
"In the view of the questioners, there currently seems to be no apparent evidence that the methods used for the forensic analysis of virtual payment flows meet scientific standards".
But that's not all. Die Linke wants to know how many cases have been filed with Financial Intelligence Units on suspicion of money laundering, and how many cases actually resulted in criminal prosecutions – noting that, in light of a total estimated volume of more than €100 Billion laundered in Germany each year, the portion of cryptocurrency value contributing to overall money laundering volume is expected to be "negligibly small".
And here's the best part: Die Linke also wants to know how the government distinguishes between legitimate use of mixers and criminal use of mixers, and whether the government is planning a potential mixer ban or other forms of regulations.
Die Linke states that "coinmixing" and other anonymization software "corresponds to a widely held need to protect one's privacy in times of ubiquitous technological surveillance by digital corporations and government authorities".
Bullish af on financial privacy today.
Full story:
https://www.therage.co/german-parliament-faces-questions-on-blockchain-surveillance/
The Left Party is going under as a party nationwide.
In view of the fact that the Left Party has shown no interest in Bitcoin whatsoever to date and has been rather dismissive, the Small Question to the Federal Government can only be understood as a (state parliament) election campaign maneuver (There are elections in two federal states this weekend.).
The only remarkable thing is that the group (no longer a party in the Bundestag) knows that there are many voters who are interested in BTC and for whom BTC is an increasingly important issue. And furthermore: if the Left knows it, then all other members of the Bundestag know it too.
Nevertheless, for years the Bundestag has only made decisions that block Bitcoin and hinder its development. Ergo: here too, the legislators - after being elected for another 4 years - are turning against the citizens. The MPs know what is good for the citizens and the economy, but do the opposite because the latter serves their interests, the preservation of the status quo.
so easy to see through this shit
the supermarket's political department warns against the color blue (before the elections, alluding to the party AFD) and yet it wears it itself everywhere, in it´s logo and in their product display.
Fedi > Mods > npub.cash > boom
Elon Musk's decision to close the X/Twitter branch in Brazil last week (as well as the arrest of Pavel Durov) pushed me to publish this article approximately 6 months ahead of schedule : Elon Musk vs. The Nation-States - The future battles between States and the Network
https://disruptive-horizons.com/p/elon-musk-vs-the-nation-states
In particular, we look at how Starlink could disrupt nation-states by taking away one of their last remaining powers against the Internet, and how Network-States could guarantee their access to an independent Internet by launching their own satellite constellation.
#disruptivehorizons #nationstates #bitcoinnostr #bitcoin #plebchain #BTC #cryptos #networkstates
great article, Olivier!
nostr:note1qxfh6avuenrq3vhv54hf97lcd4ypnm5fajcn5rr4z6swpnl0gydquadye2
The day will come when the people of two nations, brother nations, will look at each other, perplexed and deeply ashamed, and ask how they could have allowed this devastating war to be waged against each other.
Why they did not use their hearts and minds to recognize what is right.
Der Tag wird kommen, da sich die Menschen zweier Völker, Brudervölker, ratlos und tief verschämt anschauen und fragen werden, wie sie es dazu kommen lassen konnten gegeneinander diesen verheerenden Krieg zu führen.
Warum sie ihre Herzen und Hirne nicht gebrauchten, um zu erkennen was richtig ist.
"Telegram clearly fails to meet this stronger definition for a simple reason: it does not end-to-end encrypt conversations by default. If you want to use end-to-end encryption in Telegram, you must manually activate an optional end-to-end encryption feature called “Secret Chats” for every single private conversation you want to have. The feature is explicitly not turned on for the vast majority of conversations, and is only available for one-on-one conversations, and never for group chats with more than two people in them."
indeed worth the time
so, the law is:
KYC - know your customer
Okay, then. What about:
KYSA - know your state agent
From today on
the State,
representatives of the state,
Orangisations that have been given power by the State;
or their representatives,
organizations that, although they have not received any power from the state vis-à-vis the citizen in due parliamentary or administrative process, have this power de facto,
or their representatives,
forbidden to appear or act on behalf of the citizen anonymously.
From today on, the citizen has always to be informed which of the above-mentioned humans is interacting with him, with their first and last name, address and birthday to be informed.
on what legal ground ?
same as KYC
eye for an eye - tooth for a tooth