Pura vida 🤙🏻 nostr:npub148ut8u4vr8xqd4gefhg6eyc5636p5zthw3zfse2njfkezegczers59ty0w

GM nostr:npub1spdnfacgsd7lk0nlqkq443tkq4jx9z6c6ksvaquuewmw7d3qltpslcq6j7!

Pura vida 🤙🏻

👀

nostr:nevent1qqsgeh7744tdmlnwccmu0mywkprl2mt6keavzhtzzlyx5x4ukmy0sdsppamhxue69uh5umewwd68ytnrwgewn6py

Nor far off. To be more precise it is about sharing as much information as possible. There is no fundamentally false information (in physics), just information that is not shared. Like two people trying to communicate without fully understanding each other language.

I am pretty sure I am listening to AI generated songs in taxis and restaurants all over Thailand. Is it really becoming a thing?

Each partition encodes others and is itself fully encoded by others, this is why there is a coherent whole.

Our universe is made of partitions.

Talking to an AI is like talking to a rubber duck on steroids.

At first, I couldn’t understand how I, of all people, was the one to figure out the universe. Now I realize I could shove all the answers in their faces and they still wouldn’t care.

The Tractatus ends in silence because no language can describe the totality of facts. That silence is the signature of finite local informational resolution.

It's actually much simpler than that, it's just that we have limited informational capacity to access all the details of the universe.

Quantum superposition is just like not knowing what the next block will look like. It does not mean that all possibilities exist at the same time.

It's amazing how so much structure emerges from such simple mathematical concepts.

I don't know much about the academic or pop science scene

String theory is like crypto: it tackles hard problems that don't make sense from first principles, yet produces interesting techniques that might turn out useful for something else later.

I usually write my articles using markdown with embedded latex in obsidian

Right now I am too busy to dive into it, not to mention to reimplement a new standard. Also, I write all my articles on Obsidian which renders LaTeX the same way as TeXstr, if I change, I would need to either write them without proper rendering or rewrite every formula before publishing to Nostr. We would need at least a decent editor that renders the same format as Nostr clients for it to be usable in practice.

I just implemented naively what I was using on Obsidian. I would change it to a sane standard if there was one, but I am not advocating for one.

The program itself is free, so the cost is actually your living expenses in Funchal. You can get a good private room in shared apartment for about 600 eur/month (which you can also share) if you manage to avoid airbnb, that and the flight tickets would be the main expenses.

I just realized that the SAT problem in complexity theory can be reformulated in my framework as the problem of finding a flat informational network — one with globally consistent holonomies. Since SAT is NP-complete, this implies that minimizing the physical action (defined as informational curvature) is generally computationally intractable. Proving P ≠ NP would then be equivalent to showing that a non-zero curvature gap always exists, which is precisely the statement of the Yang–Mills mass gap in physics. 🤯

Quantum states can be understood as how local frames of reference encode finite information in a way that is consistent with other frames. Standard quantum mechanics implicitly assumes that the system under observation becomes fully correlated, or coherent, with the observer during measurement, allowing the observer to extract all accessible information through their mutual correlations. This local informational update is what is commonly referred to as "collapse".

The fully coherent quantum description fails when the observer's frame lacks the resolution or access to capture the full structure of the system. For instance, an observer outside a black hole cannot access the interior, so their quantum state must remain incomplete. In cosmology, rapidly expanding regions can become causally disconnected, forcing observers to work with partial, frozen information. In all these cases, the quantum state becomes a resolution-dependent approximation, an expression of what the observer can distinguish, not a globally valid object.

They should stop looking at the problem from the wrong angle, there is no need for rewriting rules, the structure of the informational network as a 2-category is enough to explain physics

It's not, I postulate a very minimal 2-category defining information that uniquely selects the Bures distance as a metric which leads to Einstein's and Yang-Mills' equations on the continuum low-resolution limit. I do not assume any deterministic rewriting rule and I actually deliver falsifiable precise novel results (like the relation of the running coupling constants)

To be more precise with the analogy: resolution in physics is roughly equivalent to block height in Bitcoin. The longer your local copy of the timechain, the more information (resolution) you possess. So, implementing Shor’s algorithm to break a sufficiently large key would be analogous to performing a large amount of PoW (an entropy cost) in physics, not something you get for free through quantum error correction magic. In short, it would require a significant amount of energy to flatten the effective local wavefunction enough to solve large problems.

Mostly b

No, space and time have completely different nature. Space is network topology, time is block height. They are decoupled from internal degrees except in higher order expansion.

Looks like it became an Elixir framework or smth

Gajos Strip is genius 😂