не храни слова в голове))) храни во времени)))

ИИ взломает эти слова) алгоритм почти готов)))

Это не только узел) но кошелек)))

биткоин заставил это сделать) блок чейн научил. биткоин инструкция) к преминению.

как пользоваться биткоином и ты не знал.. но жизнь заставила время вынудело)))

Мой день рождения через 145 блоков)

шиткойнер не поймет.

И не нужно))) 😘

биткоин уменьшает время понимания происходящего во времени до 1 блока..

рубли доллары юани... нет смысла...

язык это лишь метод верно описать суть...

ой внучек... зайди на ностр и прочитай...

Да что ты несешь??? все это фигня... калапс это когда цена чегото падает??? не смеши... это лишь время.

забери свое и жди 1 000 000

я так и делаю... просто лень... даже не изучаю другие языки... лень...Двигатель прогресса...

интересно...

но всеже. биткоин поглатит тот или иной протокол если в этом будет необходимость.

но проверять его нужно на второй монете... пусть эфир будет полигоном. так и останется для всех. на еще сотни лет)))

Privacy is the same for any blockchain system, and most transactions should be checked for openness in the chain. If you need privacy, use the additional features of L2. What's more, the BTC Satoshi address is just there, and there were no problems. A separate billing method has been implemented in EIP 4844 multi-dimensional commission markets, and it's coming soon. Speaking of which, I think the 1/4 bitcoin segwit billing method was overused and everything was crammed into the chain. If the order persists, sooner or later it will become a true BTC Maxi hated paradise. Others agree, but I don't think other chains need to reach that high level of decentralization with BTC. As long as it is more decentralized than state institutions, it has enough value to exist.

Misconception All blockchain systems that don't provide privacy at the bottom are the same. The title form of bitcoin is UTXO, so people can constantly switch to new public keys (addresses), without the need to repeatedly accumulate information on the same address (public key); at the same time, one transaction can fully open the transaction in addition, there are things like P2EP and Coinjoin, which can easily break the method of analysis of clues in the chain. However, the form of funds in Etherium are account balances, and those balances are part of the global state, so frequent changes in public keys by individuals will exacerbate the state expansion (the burden of the underlying chain); broken, so even if a person clears an account and switches to another account, the traces in the chain will be easier to analyze. Just because you don't notice a difference doesn't mean they are all the same. Myth The privacy properties of L2 can exist separately from L1. L2 always needs the means to initiate a transaction to enter, and always needs to initiate a transaction to exit. Consequently, the privacy feature of L2 cannot exist separately from L1. To give a famous example, Tornado Cash is a well-known zero-disclosure currency mixing protocol on Ethereum, you can deposit a sum of money into it and then use another account to withdraw it. This is accomplished with zero-disclosure range proofs. That sounds great, but the question is, where does your withdrawal account get its withdrawal gas from? If it came from somewhere else, it would completely eliminate the privacy effect of mixing coins. This is why Tornado Cash needs to be used with metatransactions. Your answer now is exactly the same as Vitalik's comparison of UTXO and account models back then, but it's clearly inconclusive now, at least not to me. # Misunderstanding : The multidimensional resource measurement method can solve problems caused by the global state. This is a complete misunderstanding, even if you invent a new unit of resource measurement (as Etherium is going to do by imposing an extra byte limit on single block call data), as long as the network has to reach consensus on consumption measurement. , and the problem remains. No one can guarantee that these measurements are absolutely accurate and will not need to be changed. Moreover, radical multidimensional measurement, taken to the extreme, would destroy the third element of the Etherium paradigm: the rich state. Nevertheless, I think that fans of Etherium should be happy if such a day comes, seriously. Because it means that management members are finally starting to consider the viability of the Ethereum protocol. Also, I would like to hear you argue that the Ethereum Foundation is more decentralized than state institutions.

время измеряем в блоках. это проще и не ошибемся.

размер вес качество объем