от аннигиляции не спрятаться) единственный вариант это так сильно запутать информационный шлейф, что б на распутываение потребовалось времени на % больше. а это время использовать для запутывания тора и далее)
как это сделать? да очень просто!))) достаточно пропустить информацию через несколько торов одновременно. но само уничтожение этих торов приводит к отсутствию запутанности.
если оглянуться то можно увидеть что все состоит из этих торов.
например пить воду через трубочку уже является пропуском информации через тор.
так работает мозг. он запутывает и изобретает новые методы запутывания информации .
Вы еще сильно удивитесь как вам спасли жизнь эти типы которые jnhtpf.nlyje,enskrb
tckbdctdthyj vjubvntyfncfn'jn
gfhfljrc njuj xnj yt djpvj;yj pfgenfnm ldf njhf htitjy / yf hfcgensdfybt gjnht,etncz ,jkmit dhtvtyb xtv yf pfgensdfybt/
хотите использовать для всего человечества? придется создать источники воды не просто с 101 фильтром а с запутыванием маршрута от источника до потребителя до дому. нужно тратить немного энергии, и сделать улитерокайдер странной формы и вращять)
what can be done)
catch a block and slow down time as much as possible. then create your own chain of several trillion blocks and lay them out at intervals of 1 second) yes the complexity will increase, but the blocks will already be ready to work) so you can roll back the worst scenario if it turns out to be a failure and choose the most favorable for Life 21 in
I don't need to have 51%.
it is enough to catch a block and not to send the data of its solution to the network, but to keep it for my own interests and study what may be next) for example my network is very slow and the solution goes to the network for 30 seconds, but the solution is 100% correct. therefore, any AI is able to understand this to use the data of the new block to its own interests)
I don't understand you.
But the very fact that I have caught a block and can use this knowledge to my advantage leads me to believe that it is possible to create the longest chain)
thereby questioning the algorithm that bitcoin uses.
It will not be difficult to create a super simple laser miner.
Have a few setups and do a trial run on bicoin-cache.
ok. suppose someone can turn on 49% of the network now using a different algorithm to calculate and search for when the recalculation of complexity will happen? in 1 week) and this already gives reason to worry)
i don't care what will happen there. yesterday it was shells, then gold, then fiat, then bitcoins, then another currency))) it has nothing to do with life itself.
A miner can catch a block and not broadcast the result to the network but start mining a new block.
Does this mean someone is hovering in another chain?
Only the laziest one didn't write about the great news. Allegedly BlackRock applied for a bitcoin-ETF. The truth is that BlackRock didn't apply (https://twitter.com/APompliano/status/1669488210932531200?s=20) for a bitcoin-ETF. They applied for a trust. And that's very different from an ETF.
GBTC is a trust. You can't buy bitcoin out of the fund. BlackRock is a trust, that's what you can buy back. Although the media attention to this news will most likely bring an influx of liquidity to the bitcoin market. The GBTC/SEC legal process just took an unexpected turn - the consequences are unknown. What other possible developments are possible?
No one knows the future, but given all the past failed attempts to get bitcoin-ETF approval, BlackRock is unlikely to succeed here. Although there are quite a few smart and experienced bitcoin industry people inside the BlackRock team. Writes Pompliano. (https://twitter.com/APompliano/status/1669488210932531200?s=20)
But the real intrigue is that BlackRock is the world's largest fund with $8.59 trillion under management. Four of the world's largest investment firms, led by BlackRock ($8.59 trillion), such as The Vanguard Group ($8.1 trillion), Fidelity Investments ($4.2 trillion), State Street Global Advisors ($3.48 trillion) collectively own large stakes in all the key multinationals in the world.
But even this is not the whole truth. We will never know the real reports on the total assets of these companies. For example, as of the end of 2022, the size of assets under management of only one company of the big four, Fidelity Investments, was $4.2 trillion, and the size of assets under administration was $10.3 trillion.
But Fidelity has more than 30 allegedly independent subsidiaries of all kinds. For instance, there's such a company as Fidelity International, which was originally founded in 1969 as an international investment subsidiary of Fidelity Investments in Boston, and then, as it appears on their official website, spun off as an independent business in 1980. Since then, it has continued to operate as a privately held, employee-owned company. The assets under management of this so-called independent company are $663 billion. Do you believe that TOP4 Fidelity's parent company let its subsidiary go and gave capital to its managers? I don't think so. And you should.
Besides, Fidelity has a couple of dozen more of these supposedly independent subsidiaries, including banks, and even Fidelity Bank Nigeria, in our beloved country of the defeated CBDC. Why are we discussing Fidelity? Because another company, BlackRock, applied for the Bitcoin trust. And everyone is insanely happy about it.
Back to BlackRock. Who owns this company? Do you think the owners or the managers of the company? Well, they don't. For example Merrill Lynch has a bigger stake in BlackRock than BlackRock itself, while Merrill Lynch itself is almost completely owned by BlackRock. Confused? Then read this simple (https://vc.ru/money/399195-komu-prinadlezhit-blackrock-vnutri-chernoy-gory) explanation.
The fact is, the whole big four are owned by each other. And hundreds of other companies own BlackRock stock, even Warren Buffett. And all of them together own the whole world, including all the multinational companies, and through them they own more than 80% of bitcoin.
Who is the biggest BTC owner in the world, well besides Satoshi Nakamoto and Kim Jong-un? Mike Saylor. And who owns stakes in Microstrategy? Well, it's still the same big four led by BlackRock. So don't get excited and wonder how the market will behave when the SEC approves the supposedly BTC-ETF to the largest investment fund in the world.
They already own 4 out of 5 bitcoins in this "free" market. Do you really think BlackRock needs any licenses? They own all the companies in the world, and even the governments. It's better to think why and where will you be when bitcoin becomes very expensive, so expensive that you simply won't be able to buy it. But you can sell it easily to one of the BlackRock shareholders.
Inexorably the number of people who have had the following intellectual experiences is growing:у дыры откуда масса???? это просто показатель ее вращения) чем быстрее происходит вращение тем она кажется массивней)))
просто раскрути две одинаковые юлЫ но одну рукой а вторую шуруповертом))) какая быстрее остановиться??? а значит и радиус влияния больше у той что быстрее вращяется)))) это просто логика а не уровнения на гипотизе которая основана на теории)))
Тогда помогите решить вот такой вопрос, при бесконечной скорости , начинает проявляется "отсутствие времени"?
но возрастает значимость расстояния? или наоборот? начинает проявляется "отсутствие расстояния" но возрастает значимость времени.
Просто пытаюсь хоть как то понять если скорость фотона увеличивается значит ему не важно расстояние или время?
а че проблема создать генератор простых чисел, я не пойму. че так сложно? или невозможно? даже майнинг придумали.... пипец блин... ну и цивилизация)
как это делать то ??? теорема эвклида не работает уже на 2*3*5*7*11*13+1=30031=59*509
можете попробывать от обратно) как получилось число 2? как получилось число 3??? как 7 получилось??? 13 как вышло?11 тоже как получилось? корень из этого числа!) верно? например корень из 3-х =примерно 1,7320508075688772935274463415059
но если возвести в квадрат то будет 3,0000000000000000000000000000001
а что такое перемножение? это сложение... вам нужно сложить 1,7320508075688772935274463415059 между собой 1 целый и 73сотых и сколько то там раз)))) просто? просто ) вот решайте)
корень из 13 =3,6055512754639892931192212674705 *3,6055512754639892931192212674705 но не равен 13 или будет 13.00000000000000000000000000000002923199761609733027250146837025
просто нужно сложить это число 3 целых 605 тысячных раз между собой)
3,6055512754639892931192212674705 + 3,6055512754639892931192212674705 +
3,6055512754639892931192212674705 +
0,6055512754639892931192212674705 % от числа 3,6055512754639892931192212674705 = 13 будет)
Hello developer)обнаружить 3-5-7 квадратов одиноково равномерных с 0 погрешностью всей материи покажет направление пиксилизации во времени. значит нужно увеличивать время просмотра в этой области.
тоесть если в первом квадратее 1234 галактики и во втором 1234 ив 5 1234 галактики то это не случайность. возможно придется найти и 6и 7 квадрат этих равномерностей.
это как смотреть на луну и разглядеть 7 кубиков совершенно одинаковых)
The custodian of this truth will receive satoshi from users for keeping it for a long period of time.имеем 4 значения из 3-х получается 4тое)
скорость время энергия расстояние.
но как сопоставить не понимаю))))
получается логически так. ты не можешь пройти расстояние за время не затратив энергию для скорости.
не потратив энергию невозможно пройти расстояние с определенной скоростью за время. или так... думаю...
гравитация равно время на скорость на расстояние на энергию.?
хххх", [14.06.2023 14:15]
имеем 4 значения из 3-х получается 4тое)
скорость время энергия расстояние.
но как сопоставить не понимаю))))
хххх", [14.06.2023 14:17]
получается логически так. ты не можешь пройти расстояние за время не затратив энергию для скорости.
хххх, [14.06.2023 14:18]
не потратив энергию невозможно пройти расстояние с определенной скоростью за время. или так... думаю...
its world's biggest bounty if can be hacked
miners are competing. they can build on blocks they have mined but doesn't mean other miners will auto accept additional blocks. all blocks have to be valid and meet the consensus rules but longest/heaviest chain wins
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/5540/what-does-the-term-longest-chain-mean
and what is the difference between the longest and the real one? ask someone else. anyone can do that) no time
a team that can verify or disprove this.
Or am I wrong, not to get a reasonable answer from you! 21
I'll put it simply) bitcoin can be hacked)
Hi. why does bitcoin have a vulnerability in time? why is the algorithm not perfect?
why the number of nons that miners are looking for is limited in size? these parameters can expose bitcoin to a huge fork. what i mean. a small miner can mine bitcoin for example have 1-10% of the network from 4-40 exasheh of the entire network.
and when a block is found, not to send it to the network, and hold the solution of a new block for a while, and the new solved hash should be used to find a new block. for example, to find a block and leave the ready answer for 10 seconds and start looking for a new block, say, mine for the future. and after finding the first one to send then the second, with a difference of 9 seconds. and it does not contradict the rules. but you can go longer and divide miners to search each non separately. that is, 1 miner looking for this number in the range from 0-1000 second from 1001-2000 third 2001-3000 and so on it's a matter of luck)
Of course the solution is to shift the time in the algorithm. it will remove this glitch or bug, or whatever it is called ...
Hi. why does bitcoin have a vulnerability in time? why is the algorithm not perfect?
why the number of nons that miners are looking for is limited in size? these parameters can expose bitcoin to a huge fork. what i mean. a small miner can mine bitcoin for example have 1-10% of the network from 4-40 exasheh of the entire network.
and when a block is found, not to send it to the network, and hold the solution of a new block for a while, and the new solved hash should be used to find a new block. for example, to find a block and leave the ready answer for 10 seconds and start looking for a new block, say, mine for the future. and after finding the first one to send then the second, with a difference of 9 seconds. and it does not contradict the rules. but you can go longer and divide miners to search each non separately. that is, 1 miner looking for this number in the range from 0-1000 second from 1001-2000 third 2001-3000 and so on it's a matter of luck)
Of course the solution is to shift the time in the algorithm. it will remove this glitch or bug, or whatever it is called ...
Hi. why does bitcoin have a vulnerability in time? why is the algorithm not perfect?
why the number of nons that miners are looking for is limited in size? these parameters can expose bitcoin to a huge fork. what i mean. a small miner can mine bitcoin for example have 1-10% of the network from 4-40 exasheh of the entire network.
and when a block is found, not to send it to the network, and hold the solution of a new block for a while, and the new solved hash should be used to find a new block. for example, to find a block and leave the ready answer for 10 seconds and start looking for a new block, say, mine for the future. and after finding the first one to send then the second, with a difference of 9 seconds. and it does not contradict the rules. but you can go longer and divide miners to search each non separately. that is, 1 miner looking for this number in the range from 0-1000 second from 1001-2000 third 2001-3000 and so on it's a matter of luck)
Of course the solution is to shift the time in the algorithm. it will remove this glitch or bug, or whatever it is called ...
Hi. why does bitcoin have a vulnerability in time? why is the algorithm not perfect?
why the number of nons that miners are looking for is limited in size? these parameters can expose bitcoin to a huge fork. what i mean. a small miner can mine bitcoin for example have 1-10% of the network from 4-40 exasheh of the entire network.
and when a block is found, not to send it to the network, and hold the solution of a new block for a while, and the new solved hash should be used to find a new block. for example, to find a block and leave the ready answer for 10 seconds and start looking for a new block, say, mine for the future. and after finding the first one to send then the second, with a difference of 9 seconds. and it does not contradict the rules. but you can go longer and divide miners to search each non separately. that is, 1 miner looking for this number in the range from 0-1000 second from 1001-2000 third 2001-3000 and so on it's a matter of luck)
Of course the solution is to shift the time in the algorithm. it will remove this glitch or bug, or whatever it is called ...
We can endlessly discuss current news and make plans for the future, but all these plans cannot come true if they are at odds with the main master plan of the global financial-industrial IT oligarchy.
Moreover, it is not about a secret conspiracy against humanity. These plans have their own history, ideology and even scientific justification. And most importantly, these plans are not some specially protected secret, to which only the initiated have access.
The report in question is The Limits to Growth, a Club of Rome report on the Human Problems project published in 1972. Contains the results of modeling the growth of the human population and the depletion of natural resources. Donella Meadows, Dennis Meadows, Jorgen Randers and William Behrens III contributed to the report.
The natural successor to the ideas arising from this report is Klaus Schwab and his team. Knowing Klaus Schwab's theory of the Great Reset, it is easy to answer any question.
For example, when will the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine end? When will there be peace talks? And will there be any at all? Who will win in this war? It's all easy and simple. There will be no negotiations and no one will defeat Russia yet.
Not because the Russian army is the strongest in the world, but simply because the plans of the global elites are to continue and expand the war into new theaters of war. And with a defeated Russia, this plan will be unrealized. There will be no one to fight with. The series cannot continue if the main character is removed from it.
Only you should not make your calculations relying on the opinions of countless analysts. Because they analyze official information from official sources. And such information is misinformation, which creates a cover for the implementation of the plans laid down in the same report 50 years ago.
Here's an example of a question: why are regulators so busy with cryptocurrencies right now? Why all these lawsuits against cryptocurrency exchanges? Who and why is creating an alternative reserve currency within BRICS?