What if I put down every chemical and sea life? Too broad to count?
Anyone know why snort.social doesnt work? Do they block Tor access? Does it break on deleted notes?
It's chaos maximalism.
Oh, my goal is to make it so nobody can track still. Fuck the collective.
Hitler loved animals so now my life purpose is to purge the world of animals.
"I wont legitimize what I can't use against my enemies" is the gist of it.
They will slowly lower it to account for other crimes they didn't think of during the original draft while simultaneously pushing everyone into that bracket with inflation.
From what I can tell, changing the OS gets rid of a lot of the camera magic anyway.
And once its acceptable at any amount it will eventually be acceptable for any amount.
And with inflation eating that value away constantly in a few decades, or shorter, it will be no different than a couple bucks today. Yaaaaaay
I was thinking of moving to a Pixel from my S20Fe and use Calyx or Graphene. Which Pixels do you recommend?
Oh, I didnt know there would be room left to fit some gold afterwards 😆
So nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx gave an absolute masterclass on the problems with Musk's current Twitter approach on WBD, starting at the 17m mark. It's a great advertisement for Nostr and I recommend everyone watch it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ms-dE6aasA
I've been retweeting or reposting Odell's various observations on this topic for a while and so I'm happy to share this too, including on Twitter today, even as a filthy blue-check myself.
Where I disagree with Odell (slightly) is on tactics. He thinks people should give up blue checks in protest. And that's a very fair position. I don't disagree, especially for someone like Odell with a purist position and a generally cypherpunk audience.
But I think there are multiple successful paths on this. I have always been a Twitter fan, and my normie audience is there. I wanted to be able to pay for better UX and anti-impersonation defenses for years before they became available. Just because Musk is running it doesn't mean I won't pay for helpful services, especially if they protect my audience. Real people lose money to Lyn Alden impersonation scams if they can't tell my account from others, and I directly hear from them when it happens. It's always heartbreaking.
So, I'm on the offensive, not the defensive. The way I view it, unless or until someone censors me on Twitter, they're locked in there with me, rather than me being locked in there with them. If having a blue check reduces the success rate of impersonation scams and amplifies my reach at calling out Twitter's problems, I'll have the blue check. What I absolutely *won't* do is change what I say based on a blue check. If anything, I purposely overdo it to the opposite and exaggerate my criticisms on purpose to push back against platform incentives.
Two simultaneous approaches:
1) Call out the problem on Twitter. Don't give Musk a pass. Point out that a pro-freedom, pro-anonymity view doesn't match with what is going on there. Don't let his rhetoric disguise his inaction. If Twitter cares about freedom and anonymity then they will offer a paid option that doesn't require identity (e.g. the "orange check" bitcoin payment.) Until something like that, they are LARPing and are fair to criticize as such.
2) Have your foot here on Nostr and on decentralization technologies generally. In the long run, I think this is the future. And more importantly, I hope it is.
Ahhhh its so close to 5 and I already feel the slow down of the coming #Zapathon
Oh, that could be it too! When did lightning actually take off? I havent looked into its use history yet.
They'll never survive the sirens call! Arr narrrr!