Avatar
BHN 🍁
0d1dd56ae3204328e45f78b1a64ac8f06d227129f775493ebe84cf28250d1ec6
I frequently have opinions on things I know too little about. "From cradle to cradle I shall say many stupid things"

That tardigrade is HUGE!!

Now that you brought it up I will change it to the real sexy trudeau pic πŸ˜‰

And if you struggle to make payments that rate goes up to 27-28%, in Canada anyway.

Replying to Avatar mleku

the theme engine of gnome 4 is a clunky copy of the MacOS style with dark and light frames in the same frame, and no support for GTK3 theme engines.

i like Adapta, which in code editors is known as "material oceanic", it is a dark green theme. Gnome 4 makes my desktop into a dog's breakfast of pseudo mac looking garbage.

i'm also very pissed at Gnome devs for the pointless and intrusive Tracker3 search engine back end. it always crawls my massive collections of code and fucks up my ability to work, play games, and generally enjoy use of my computer. Tracker has been a problem since they started that shit in gnome 3. it's idiotic, because for the most part, slocate does the main job of indexing your filesystem, i am more often searching for filenames than wanting to search content, and that's what Tracker3's specialty is.

i just turn it off, forcibly, it always hits me out of the blue after a few weeks running a new installation and i'm so frustrated. i've managed to keep an installation ongoing, but yeah, between the constant mangling of gnome's dconf registry style configuration system (at least as bad as windows registry) and ubuntu's habit of upgrading kernels that are locked in with packages that i can't uninstall, that don't support my video hardware, black screen boot out of the blue, and unhelpfully difficult to access GRUB configuration.

this is why my system now is running arch, cinnamon, themed with adapta, tracker3 is disabled forcibly, as well as in the configuration.

btw, you should see how intrusive tracker3's settings are in dconf.

it's almost like they are putting it in there to spy on us, all they need to do is slide into your user profile via some vulnerable app and they can just snarf tracker's indexes and quickly determine what your business is.

i don't like Mark Shuttleworth, I don't like Gnome Foundation and I don't like the Linux kernel either. all of them are sus as fuck, most likely NSA fronts just like all the rest of tech.

I can understand lots of that is bad (i need to look i to tracker3 now), but what's up with the linux kernel now? If there are important problems with it, I want to know.

Whats the disaster with gnome? I haven't used many distros. My primary two are Mint Cinnamon and Unraid. Ive used Linux Lite and it felt like a transition between windows and Mint.

The judgement is a perception that can also be more or less correct.

Replying to Avatar signal_and_rage

this is how nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft bunker works nostr:note1pcql5pruj0cumsnj2dymyfhevzmwaac9s79h427s38gjxkz2gv0qetw4mu

He inputs the correct code on every single lock to lower the secret elevator to the Pablo Pad.

It's probably the same reason everybody uses Windows and not Linux: familiarity and ease of transition. Sure, Linux has way more personality and distros, but that makes it less appealing of a transition than mimicking what is already known.

At the least, the clones can introduce them to the concepts at a slower pace so they can develop an interest in the more creative projects that people will work.

Yea, my solution is to force restart the app... it usually gets messages coming in again.

It can be difficult to distinguish madness and genius.

So you agree that there is an objective reality and as such objective, but not necessarily universal, truths exist.

Would you disagree with the view that we interpret these truths individually, to a greater or lesser accuracy, and some people have more accurate interpretations of these truths, neither perfect nor complete? Some perspectives have proven long lasting and exist beyond the original viewer due to a greater accuracy to some truth of the universe? (Example: Einsteins General and Special Relativity)

Another question: Would you say people experiencing reality subjectively is an objective fact or a subjective interpretation?

If subjective, why should we believe other people experience things subjectively? Or experience anything at all?