say niet to paper bitcoin :)
#[2]
Not sure I agree. If by limited supply we mean “fixed monetary policy”, then that aspect is dependent on the others. The protocol could continue to function if the monetary supply changed, but that would be disastrous from a social/network perspective as opposed to a purely protocol perspective
Yes permissionlessness enables censorship resistant node running which safeguards the limited supply
I don’t think so. I’ve had disagreements even on nostr about whether the “limited” (ie 21 mill) aspect of bitcoin supply is more important than the fact that the monetary policy is fixed (enforced by nodes). The lessons of the block size wars are still not well learned by most. Not to mention that it is the permissionless nature of bitcoin that enables censorship resistance and limited supply in the first place
Vida uses a 2FA DM
yikes
Join market/payjoin coordination assistance
Something like the slashpay protocol that Synonym is working on. So someone could scan my npub QR and then our clients figure out how they’ll pay me
if a friend asks for advice on buying bitcoin and they tell you they won’t self-custody, tell them not to buy bitcoin
playing Machi Koro, ifykyk
reductio ad essentia, a fallacy(?) I was unfamiliar with
spectacular entrance, welcome!
I still dial lots of loved one’s phones by memory. Either it’s a number from back in land line days, or from potato flip phone days when it was faster to just dial
An opt in, in-app button that turns on splits to your client dev’s wallet all zaps you send and receive
what do we think? I feel like someone has to have suggested this
