GM world

Harvard has 4x their Bitcoin position last quarter, making it their biggest bag and you are bearish?

#Harvard #Bitcoin

GM ☀️

Bitcoin fork talk isn’t analysis — it’s insecurity.

Every time the conversation heats up about forks, soft or hard, the loudest voices aren’t the ones running nodes or writing code —

they’re the ones terrified their bags won’t make it through a protocol discussion.

So they posture.

They moralise.

They gatekeep the conversation like moderators of a Discord server, not stewards of a global monetary system.

Here’s the truth they won’t say out loud:

People who actually understand Bitcoin aren’t scared of forks.

Because they understand:

Bitcoin’s social consensus is stronger than any one “admin.”

Economic majority wins, not “who shouted on IRC.”

Forks are a feature — a safety valve for disagreement, not a threat.

The ones freaking out are the ones who don’t know:

How consensus works

How hash power migrates

How client diversity protects the chain

How market consensus kills bad forks instantly

So they cling to the conversation, pretending they’re protecting Bitcoin,

when really they’re protecting their personal sense of economic safety.

It’s fear dressed up as authority.

And the funniest part?

If they genuinely believed their Bitcoin was safe, they wouldn’t feel the need to shut down fork discussions.

They’d be calm.

They’d be technical.

They’d be rational.

But they're not.

They’re anxious.

Defensive.

Desperate to look like they’re “in charge” of something that, by design, no one is in charge of.

Bitcoin isn’t fragile.

They are.

#Bitcoin #BitcoinFork #ForkTalk

GM nostr!

These grape hyacinths are definitely not supposed to be blooming right now.

But it doesn't care.

Like us Bitcoiners, we're supposed to do things that we're not doing, and we don't care what other people want from us.

Be like this grape hyacinth.

Do what you want!

Have a blessed Sunday!

GM

#Nostr #Bitcoin #Zap

GM

Bitcoin fork talk isn’t analysis — it’s insecurity.

Every time the conversation heats up about forks, soft or hard, the loudest voices aren’t the ones running nodes or writing code —

they’re the ones terrified their bags won’t make it through a protocol discussion.

So they posture.

They moralise.

They gatekeep the conversation like moderators of a Discord server, not stewards of a global monetary system.

Here’s the truth they won’t say out loud:

People who actually understand Bitcoin aren’t scared of forks.

Because they understand:

Bitcoin’s social consensus is stronger than any one “admin.”

Economic majority wins, not “who shouted on IRC.”

Forks are a feature — a safety valve for disagreement, not a threat.

The ones freaking out are the ones who don’t know:

How consensus works

How hash power migrates

How client diversity protects the chain

How market consensus kills bad forks instantly

So they cling to the conversation, pretending they’re protecting Bitcoin,

when really they’re protecting their personal sense of economic safety.

It’s fear dressed up as authority.

And the funniest part?

If they genuinely believed their Bitcoin was safe, they wouldn’t feel the need to shut down fork discussions.

They’d be calm.

They’d be technical.

They’d be rational.

But they're not.

They’re anxious.

Defensive.

Desperate to look like they’re “in charge” of something that, by design, no one is in charge of.

Bitcoin isn’t fragile.

They are.

#Bitcoin #BitcoinFork #ForkTalk

GM

Moin💥

…

GN Frens 🐇🌓😴💤

#TheRabbitsTales #einundzwanzig