nostr:note1ze3vpu8j5pvvg3lswh80jpq63hwfkv2rk7szedyk3c9ylzndkr6skyx5vk
lnbc9990n1pjv88empp5qrrslssmg54vm4jt5kk9lz8vdfatyl3sjm403x3fem6ae4uh77jsdqu2askcmr9wssx7e3q2dshgmmndp5scqzzsxqyz5vqsp57f9nee5xre4nnl36dx058l5quaa2a4y8z8wqy72yjeq6vxjppm3s9qyyssqxmrfzkq0pza3vyq7d3uu5d4hg8c2qljspcccc7hhdf38ggkuss8ykq7gwcw5vtpcrcy46nc5dlwpdv566kuzk9ngq2dl4gws7tc6khgqcqyrw6
Definitely crackable, but not easy or practical. So first you should subdue me, steal the plates, and have the know how to crack the code. You should also know what do those symbols hide. Would that be worth for the satoshis of a pleb like me? šMy guess is most people that would be intetested in stealing like half BTC lacks the know how I described. Ultimately however, every approach has a blind spot.
What if I use a custom codex I myself only know to encode it first?
I find the bowtie goofy, I am a classical tie person myself
I think we are converging towards common grounds. The answer to your rhetorical question is, such way of living cannot be protected because it would lack any mean not only of censorship but also the set of heuristics needed to find a common solution, as well as any countermeasure to evil. If you silence an anon pedo on twitter does it mean he stopped hurting children? Of course not, but we can get the feeling or the vibe that our internal world, or our own internal representation of such world, is devoid of that content. And yet most people that openly vouche for children protection and blast on Elon basically just wish for a timeline that does not make them feel uncomfortable with the product they are consuming. Those Bitcoiners sects you mentioned are so far off the libertarian spectrum that are not even worth considering in my opinion. What they advocate for is anarco-fascism, a state of anarchy āmantainedā by the use of arbitrary individual forceā¦. Happy gunning? š
I agree with you that child porn is vile and criminal. I donāt want to see it at all, in any shape of form. BUTā¦ I never said I am for āfreedom of speechā. In fact I donāt believe in it. My true point is such thing does not exist. What does exist is restricted/unrestricted speech, or better said, restricted and unreatricted media. Sharing porn might not strictly be a freedom of speech issue but under a true freedom of speech paradigm you have zero means to impede it. This is the gigantic fallacy of ālibertariansā and West in general. Individual freedoms are abstractions we invented to fit a consummeristic society into a moral paradigm of sorts. In nature you are free to do whatever you are physically adept to survive. Nothing is handed to you other than life itself.
It is my conviction that everybody ever holding a sign protesting/manifesting for any individual freedom at least since the early 2000s to this day in any western country was 0% motivated by the greater good and 100% motivated by its own personal, hyperlocal and blind self-interest.
Rigorous thinking necessarily requires isolation because in its absence, our mammal brain is too cued in by social constructs to perform rigorous critical and abstract thinking. The second best to isolation is discipline. Although it is hard to be disciplined in a society that does not reward disciplin, but slackery.
Also, on a side not, I find fascinating that if on one hand you criticize Elon for āgatekeeping speechā, on the other you express concerns about the contents you donāt like - and imply that you welcome censorship of those. My sense is that you are for the freedom of *your* speech, but against the freedom of speech of others, or in any case, such freedom is conditional.
Would you mind me explaining how is Elon gatekeeping freedom of speech exactly? Could you make the argument that the previous (woke) board was *not* gatekeeping freedom of speech and information flow? Do you have a counter argument to this statement: all social media platforms are, by definition, information gates.