Here’s the #[0]​ #StopThePresses overlay image as a png with transparent background.

#Plebchain — do your thing.

#NYTimesUp

Hate to break it to you, freaks, but the state isn’t going to let bitcoin happen. You’re going to need to engage in some civil disobedience at some point.

Had to delete the Bitcoin Mag app and unfollow them after their shift towards shitcoinary. Lost integrity, lost company

#[0]

Answer all of these questions please:

1) Are digital images scarce?

2) Does 1 sat = 1 sat?

3) Does a unique hash on a blockchain indicate proof of ownership in a court of law?

There's a level of fair argument here, but all marketing is hype, the law only considers it deceptive if it lies about the nature of the product itself.

An iPhone ad will try to convince you to drop two grand on the new one because it has features Android has had for years, but if the iPhone actually does what is claimed, hyped up marketing doesn't make the product itself a scam.

If marketing overemphasising the value proposition of a product makes the product itself a scam, everything that's been advertised could be argued to be a scam.

What I mean by no deception is the seller isn't lying about what they're selling. It's a jpeg connected to a hash on a blockchain. They're not claiming it's something more than it is.

If someone is willing to bid and pay ridiculous BTC for it, a fool and their money...

And as I said it does reflect poorly on Bitcoin Magazine for participating, it's an obvious cash grab.

Gente bonita que me envió #zap está semana.

A veces, la verdadera felicidad se encuentra en dar sin esperar nada a cambio. La vida nos recompensa de maneras maravillosas cuando somos generosos y amables con los demás. La vida les recompensará el doble. Gracias 🫂😊 #Nostr

#[0]

#[1]

#[2]

#[3]

#[4]

#[5]

#[6]

#[7]

#[8]

#[9]

#[10]

#[11]

#[12]

#[13]

#[14]

#[15]

#[16]

#[17]

#[18]

#[19]

#[20]

#[21]

#[22]

#[23]

#[24]

#[25]

#[26]

#[27]

#[28]

#[29]

#[30]

#[31]

#[32]

#[33]

#[34]

#[35]

What I mean by no deception is the seller isn't lying about what they're selling. It's a jpeg connected to a hash on a blockchain. They're not claiming it's something more than it is.

If someone is willing to bid and pay ridiculous BTC for it, a fool and their money...

And as I said it does reflect poorly on Bitcoin Magazine for participating, it's an obvious cash grab.

I don't believe the idea that 'there's no deception involved'. U actually think the entire ecosystem was built on a foundation of deception & fraud.

I agree wrt it reflecting poorly on Bitcoin Magazine.

I'm on the fence about the scam label though. Not because I'm defending NFTs as such, but more because the consumer knows full well what they are buying (a record on a blockchain pointing to a jpeg).

When there's no deception involved and the customer is aware of what they're buying, it's more a case of "a fool and their money are soon parted" imo.

Again I agree it's just a cash grab by Bitcoin Magazine and cheapens their brand. 100%.

Def need to make that happen

Great bitcoin advertising.

If Bud Light is eth

What is #Bitcoin

Hitler seized the Rothchilds assets. He went after the mass murdering communists and the central bankers behind them. Simple fact. Take it or leave it. Hollywood isn't history.