Listening to nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx and nostr:npub1guh5grefa7vkay4ps6udxg8lrqxg2kgr3qh9n4gduxut64nfxq0q9y6hjy , and the argument for supporting Open Sats and bitcoin developers is too strong to ignore supporting the maintenance of the network that backs my #bitcoin . Why doesn’t @saylor and the “bitcoin development company” $mstr appreciate this ?
Now there are ETFs, I think there is an argument for share holder activitism, even with the strong argument for mstr over an etf. Thoughts nostr:npub1k7vkcxp7qdkly7qzj3dcpw7u3v9lt9cmvcs6s6ln26wrxggh7p7su3c04l ?
Very good points made, but rather than Bitcoin development being about tinkering, “getting one of your upgrades into core”, or implementing what your benefactor wants, how’s about viewing it as maintaining the skills, competences and capabilities to be able to make changes if particular issues arise in the future. If we ossify and developers disband, there will be no one left with the ability, if, in a particular scenario where “Bitcoin had to be saved”
Shot in foot realisation. So, who is going to call Saylor a larp?
I strongly agree. The only argument that I can think of from nostr:npub15dqlghlewk84wz3pkqqvzl2w2w36f97g89ljds8x6c094nlu02vqjllm5m side is he might see any change on the base chain protocol is an danger ro the stability of it. So he might think it shouldn’t be “upgraded”. Do whatever you fancy on layer 2 but leave base-chain as it is. Which is not something I hear debated enough. There is this talk about ordinals and it’s related to this difference in approach. So I can understand if he thinks like this he probably don’t see the point supporting to the biggest threat he can think of.
But just to contradict myself I can also see the point where this people actually do their best to keep the network protect against some vulnerabilities it might already possess. Maybe what opensats should do (I think nostr:npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc is the perfect asset for this) better communicate why BitcoinDevs are important and should be supported. Probably nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx and nostr:npub1guh5grefa7vkay4ps6udxg8lrqxg2kgr3qh9n4gduxut64nfxq0q9y6hjy already discussed this but I may be ignorant.
Maybe nostr:npub14mcddvsjsflnhgw7vxykz0ndfqj0rq04v7cjq5nnc95ftld0pv3shcfrlx can suggest some good discussions about this.
🫡
Ossification is one thing, incremental, variance reducing, super high reliability system style improvement (sorry done some work in this area) is another thing and definitely not ossification.
Oh, thanks so much, 🙌
Listening to nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx and nostr:npub1guh5grefa7vkay4ps6udxg8lrqxg2kgr3qh9n4gduxut64nfxq0q9y6hjy , and the argument for supporting Open Sats and bitcoin developers is too strong to ignore supporting the maintenance of the network that backs my #bitcoin . Why doesn’t @saylor and the “bitcoin development company” $mstr appreciate this ?
Now there are ETFs, I think there is an argument for share holder activitism, even with the strong argument for mstr over an etf. Thoughts nostr:npub1k7vkcxp7qdkly7qzj3dcpw7u3v9lt9cmvcs6s6ln26wrxggh7p7su3c04l ?
Great work from nostr:npub1w4dsvkv5hq73p4wm6gadpcxs6fwshcys44f5tnnzze2g3hfs2p0qn23vhw and nostr:npub1w9dlp3nm3unua6es97nt3rfglkuz4lezvp6wlp48mjktu9f0jkdspl56ya on reviewing the current economic situation. “Yeah, I’m enjoying my steak and sparkling water (on credit), so anyone catch the came last night?”,
It’s bread and circuses times boys, right before they do a 6102 on you and seize ALL your assets. This is not a drill.
https://canadianbitcoiners.com/research-round-up-week-of-april-7-2024/
Will do, have the whole family in tow, so will introducing it into the mix!
Hey hey nostriches, anyone know of good places to go in Charlotte North Carolina? More #bitcoin the better.



