Oh, man, I didn’t realize you’re working on Oak! What an awesome work! Been trying to push this solution to our community, but, sadly, too few people run #lightning nodes.

Do you see any ways of further development/adoption/scaling of this model towards the less tech savvy users?

It is custodial. However since it is a redirect I do not see any threat here. Plus I’m just saying that’s what I believe to be the best solution so far.

Maybe if I got more zaps it would mine faster. ⚡️

Been looking forward for Oak to become more newbie friendly. We need a solution for the masses.

Been looking forward for Oak to become more newbie friendly. We need a solution for the masses.

Oak Node has had Shadowy LN Tips since 6 months or so: nostr:note1qqqg4tylv66ecf3cdr7tudhvqq03furkggvaxh54kyf7f0n9mp6qzrlhaa

Lets you "zap" any note by simply liking it. Works from any Nostr client. Sats sent non-custodially, from your own Umbrel.

Still can’t believe Damus is being forced to take zaps away.

Do u run a relay?

Spin one up and I'll change your mind within one week.

I can fill your relay with 1 TB of spam non-sense and you can pay to store it and bandwidth transfer to so you don't have to censor.

I absolutely delete garbage from my relay and it is truly retarded to spend money to store gibberish

As described above, yes.

However, if you don’t want to have to keep the file, you can pre-compute combinations of nonce, byte-range, and hash. Store these sets in a much smaller file, and then use the next one from the list to challenge the provider.

So for example, say you want the provider to be able to prove storage once a week for a decade. You’ll need ~600 tuples of nonce/byte-range/hash. Each of these records would take roughly 128 bytes to store. 128 x 600 = ~77Kb.

Thus for a decade of weekly storage proofs, you need to store less than a tenth of a megabyte per file.

Note that this storage requirement is completely independent of the file size. So it may be advantageous to combine related files together into an archive (zip) so that you need only pay the tuple storage cost once.

Each tuple should be used only once. So if you’re planning to have multiple suppliers, you’ll want to multiply by that number when precalculating.

From which wallet ?

As described above, yes.

However, if you don’t want to have to keep the file, you can pre-compute combinations of nonce, byte-range, and hash. Store these sets in a much smaller file, and then use the next one from the list to challenge the provider.

So for example, say you want the provider to be able to prove storage once a week for a decade. You’ll need ~600 tuples of nonce/byte-range/hash. Each of these records would take roughly 128 bytes to store. 128 x 600 = ~77Kb.

Thus for a decade of weekly storage proofs, you need to store less than a tenth of a megabyte per file.

Note that this storage requirement is completely independent of the file size. So it may be advantageous to combine related files together into an archive (zip) so that you need only pay the tuple storage cost once.

Each tuple should be used only once. So if you’re planning to have multiple suppliers, you’ll want to multiply by that number when precalculating.

Yes thank you very much. This is exactly the kind of mechanism I was thinking about. So basically you’ll need a really small« backup » in order to challenge your storage provider, and you could even imagine a penalty system (Lightning inspired) if the provider fails to provide the proof after you paid him.

So this leads to my second question: do such systems already exist, or are they discussed ? And could nostr/Lightning lead to it ?

Is anyone already tried to plug midjourney to a Nostr bot ?

It didn’t work cause almost nobody cared about mining pubkeys.

I tried that PoW pubkey experiment and it didn’t work. Most people are simply not going to mine a pubkey.

Why you doing this lol it’s not gonna fucking work

Larping as a giveaway tryna steal sats ?