I had a coworker who grew up in north china (jilin), he said during elementary school (late 90s) he had class field trips to north Korea -- the trips made him to appreciate home a lot. I think he mentioned there was no running water/sewage or something.
He described how moving to the US made him realize how far underdeveloped China was (especially his region), which was wild for him because he thought he was comparably well-off
I see at least two cameras outside 👀
nah, being a sugar daddy isn't that much fun
I remember when YouTube was a niche, and Twitch used to be a sports streaming site before it got it's name. "No one is going to watch videos on the internet, turn on the TV and record with DVR" -- not that long ago
Niches move things forward 👀
https://www.crowe.com/tw/en-us/insights/insight-article_1130611
This shit is hilarious, Taiwan regulators posts guidelines for platforms that handles virtual assets (VASP) -- for the sake of giving shitcoins a playground.
By their definition in section 3, these guidelines declares Bitcoin as not a virtual asset and none of the platforms should be able to list it.
I really can't tell if they're being genius (making a clear distinction between Bitcoin and everything else) or clowns (thinks Bitcoin fall into these guidelines)
nostr:note1lmvp6zyz3pfls6qpkpeujjujgpgyskm5zhn507kjshkzlpcauqesd6vewu
practice what you preach 🙏
I don't judge, let the dirty mind wander on another npub 🤣
please consider testing your zaps on nostr:npub1e4qg56wvd3ehegd8dm7rlgj8cm998myq0ah8e9t5zeqkg7t7s93q750p76 😎
your feed....😳 🫣 I thought you were religious
perhaps you'll find this helpful. Sounds like your build requests invoices correctly if successful payments are already registered as zaps.
You only need to add lightning URIs in order to open wallet apps then -- your client just waits for the event 9735 to show up that says the payment was completed (I imagine you want your client to handle the zapper and zapped user differently).
i just zapped nostr:npub1ne99yarta29qxnsp0ssp6cpnnqmtwl8cvklenfcsg2fantuvf0zqmpxjxk 5 sats AFTER successfully generating an invoice and copy-pasting it on nostr:npub1getal6ykt05fsz5nqu4uld09nfj3y3qxmv8crys4aeut53unfvlqr80nfm like a #normie 
NOW , today, i need to learn how to skip all that normie activity, and open the extension automatically to carry on with the zapping. #zap #pow #progress #rosecoco
generally most nostr clients generate custom URIs that start with "lightning:" when discovering things like invoices or LNURLs to communicate with other apps. I was under the impression that Alby responds to lightning: URIs so clicking on links should open the extension already.
If the client you are using doesn't generate lightning: URIs then copy-pasting invoices is probably the way out (this was the norm before 11/22). generally when protocols used in links can't be handled by the browser it gets passed to the OS to find an application to handle the link. A way you can do this is create a entry for xdg-open to respond to lightning: URIs and set whatever command needed to execute.
what kind of reading have you been doing? 😳
晶片是用搶的，產量稀少。願意跟任何人做生意是台灣人的自由，不管什麼國際壓力，沒有不賣給中國大陸的事。台灣人就是比較實際，拿烏克蘭戰爭當例子，雙方無人機還不都有台灣晶片包含在內？說怕人家不賣，是找藉口吧，明明是怕買不起而已。
五桐絕張了啦。CCP喊了七十多年，沒有任何成果，再喊是出老千。侵略海島哪需要航母，共機裝迷路繞台，飛彈亂射惹得不只是台灣人， 矛盾一堆 。 侵略俄羅斯還比較有道理呢，好主意。
台灣不只是半導體, 2300萬人絕對不是當棋子看，有空要來玩
eats the world, gets an orange hat 👀
沒人在怕Nvidia啦。 Nvidia只不過是台積電的其中的客人，靠著AI潮流股價高了一些。 壟斷晶片設計的市場可沒那麼容易，絕對會有競爭者。黃仁勳說多愛台灣為他拍手， 但Nvidia絕對願意繼續賣AI計算給中國共產黨。
說到制裁，你知道現在還能出貨到中國大陸的nvidia顯示卡實際上更本就是一樣的東西嗎？實體是一樣的，原理很簡單因為台積電沒閒時間為了對岸朋友打特別的晶片。效能低是軟體/firmware上的限制， ODM還是排隊願意用任何規格賣顯示卡進去中國的。AI制裁更本就是在演戲--行銷制裁。禁售令不太可能，中國買不起才比較實際。
nice hoodie 👀 did he finally stop shitcoining or something?
torrent galaxy been down for about a day now, hope not too serious
https://torrentfreak.com/torrentgalaxy-goes-offline-with-mysterious-message-to-users-240614/
nostr:note1qxjzhm9sjtf2g4shkw9gy3mpnhs7cyskj488n5x2c73s7esa3emsx0s6d0
it's back! 🥳
nostr:note1n6lssg26fpwkyvh2g8m5frh7h59pxl7tlujhgnwsw72vdgvt047s6fx0xe
none of my suits fit me anymore 🫣
not the same person anymore
that could be interesting (seems to be an awful waste of compute cycles to filter out noise added for no reason), but what is concerning to me is allowing services to alter creator's content in this fashion. It's now yet another hoop to jump through (identifying and removing adstream) to get to content created-as-intended -- further deteriorates the legitimacy of these services to distribute content, generally
Adding (any) barriers between users and content is ultimately a bad thing because content should traverse freely. Creators seek to get the best terms to spread to the widest audience and be paid directly. The traditional models centered only for the sake of fiat-payments can only go so far. In a way I feel like the history of the internet will repeat itself.... eventually users and creators-alike will be squeezed so hard to move to alternatives.