Do you know if it's possible to mirror it to some other relay in order to load it with all your previous nostr history, for example?
NIP-05 should not be treated as "user verification" of any kind. Just as a user alias.
Showing checkmark on pfp for users with NIP-05 aliases confuse people.
I prefer Amethyst's way of doing checkmark: it means it's a follow user.
Payments.
🥜
It is indeed.
OpenLDAP is using it since years ago.
Te refieres a tus 'folows' o a tus 'followers'?
La lista de tus follows debería mostrarse igual en cualquier cliente, a no ser que alguno no esté siendo capaz de recoger la lista actualizada, y esté mostrando alguna versión antigua.
La lista de tus followers no existe como tal lista, la construye el cliente usando las listas de follows de otros usuarios donde aparece tu pubkey, por lo que depende directamente del estado de los relays a los que se conecta cada cliente en ese momento, puesto que puede que no esté encontrando a los mismos usuarios de la red.
Agree.
It was proposed weeks ago to add DNS TXT record verification to NIP-05, so that NIP-05 could work with just a DNS query.
No webserver, no HTTPS, no certificate/CA, just a DNS query.
But it was rejected for the sake of simplicity.
Which is understandable too, by the way.
#[4] , does it work with pubkey whitelist or with Auth (NIP-42)?
#[3] , does Amethyst support authentication in relays right now?
NFT and DAO??
🤣🤣
When I was a child they use to tell me "it takes two to argue".
And exactly that it's what it looks like here:
Two parts overreacting with such a stupid thing.
It looks so childish, sorry.
Sorry, but I don't get how a discussion between features of gas stoves vs. electric ones can become something political.
I think it's such a mass media circus.
They could still be superior in lots of things but not on electricity dependence.
I don't get your point.
Things are usually not white or black.
Ah, right!!
Did they close 'olde NIP-23' because the new consensus is to signal the relay-list where the user publish events on kind-0?
But NIP-23's relay list was still useful to be used for clients configuration, isn't it?
Why are you saying bye bye to NIP-23?
👍
Or at least with an expiration date.