With Amber you don't have to manually approve each event sign.
You can assign permission to auto-approve certain event signatures.
Changing platforms doesn't make lots of sense.
The real solution is replacing platforms by a protocol.
That's why #nostr
π«
A prize of 1.72 Million bitcoins... Not too bad.
βΊοΈ
Hiding the "where" is important too, even when they know the "who".
Agree.
But honestly, I don't see that happening anymore.
Wall Street is deliberately leaving those unprivileged out of bitcoin, once again.
I miss the good ol' days of 2019 and before...
π« π
Ok.
Just beware you are entering stormy waters... as they are very different things fighting a civil war against fascism than bombing police and elected officials in a democracy.
I have been living the 'conflict' my whole life. So I know different people and views. I, myself, have changed my views through the years, as I have found several people arguing they were "fighting fascism" and not realizing they had indeed became the fascists themselves.
Nationalism is a shitcoin.
π«
I meant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_Strict_Transport_Security
But actually it should be using a CAA DNS record to set which CA is allowed to sign certificates for the domain.
Damn. A Brazilian certificate authority trusted only by Microsoft has issued a presumably-unauthorized certificate for google.com: https://follow.agwa.name/notice/AoZSMI38xcA3TrN1sm
All security practices in the world are useless if one of the most visited sites such as Google gets a unauthorized TLS certificate issued. How this still exists in 2024 is beyond me.
HSTS
Looking forward to it!!
Thank you so much for your work!
π«
It's very hard for corporations to build open protocols.
Every of their usual incentives push them to build platforms, not protocols.
π«
One app at a time...
Step by step building the other stuff... πͺ

