What for?
I would be endangering good people.
Unpopular opinion:
Attendance to local Bitcoin meetups is bad opsec.
🫂
https://blog.cloudflare.com/password-reuse-rampant-half-user-logins-compromised/
the only way for cloudflare to have this data is if it is inside the ssl channel, analyzing traffic to their customers who are logging in.
ssssoooooooo i guess this makes the cloudflare logs a massive target for nation states now?
Centralisation is a risk.
Internet was supposed to be decentralised.
🫂
Good for you 💪
PS: Unpopular opinion: lockdowns saved lives.
A bill has been introduced to the US congress, H.R.1161, to rename Greenland to Red, White, and Blueland.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1161
USA is losing so fast every credibility it could have around the world.
🤡
Ok.
But spending time in I a way you like is not wasting it, imo.
🫂 GM
For me, being a #bitcoiner has nothing to do with friends, political views, hobbies, religion, moral or whatever other thing.
If you think bitcoin is positive for the society, you are a bitcoiner.
GM 🫂
False dichotomy.
Being not chosen doesn't imply being found.
GN 🫂
I'm neither a mathematician nor cryptographer. And English is not my mother tongue.
So maths semantics are even trickier to play with for me. ☺️
Nice cha either way.
GN 🫂
Ok, maybe we are discussing semantics here, but let's see if this makes sense:
If a*b=c , you don't "find c" multiplying a*b.
"c" is just the same as "a*b". It's just another way to represent a*b.
"c" is "a*b".
Numbers are not found.
Measurements could be found, but not numbers. Numbers are by themselves.
You find the 'surface of a rectangle' with sides lengths a & b, by multiplying a*b. Right.
But you don't find numbers, just measures.
Does it make sense?
As I said, maybe it's just semantics...
🫂 GN
It's not.
A unique strong global fiat money is not good for Bitcoin adoption.
🫂