Not really. At negative net discount rates the NPV doesn’t compute. Also, as a retail Investor you fly blind. You are the last one to find out anything after the cantillions, investment bankers, PE/VC, Corporate Insiders etc. yes, equity track with inflation, but retail investor ROI doesn’t keep up with inflation.
First Republic next bank to fail today — trading halted. 
I actually think it’s institutions…breaking rank. They know what’s coming, they actually know Bitcoin and they don’t want to be left holding the bag.
Yes, although it’s more extreme than you describe. VCs pick few individual companies that are not viable and pump them. Tesla, Amazon. They aren’t profitable for decades, but are consciously selected, puppet leaders put on place (Musk), to allocate capital to the few. Or, Boeing. They should be long out of business. Without government contracts and bailouts they’d be gone. And think of all the innovation and new businesses that society missed out on. Maybe we’d be flying around in small personalized drones if the trillions in wasted capital would have gone to entrepreneurs and innovation rather than Boeing with 1940s technology.
Elon is not your friend. He might send out provocative shitposts here and there, but he is not on your side. I don’t think he’s ever done anything good?
It’s 4 pm Friday. Do you know where your money is? #Bitcoin
Freudian slip from the CNBC propaganda machine?
Bitcoin gains amid growing investor concern over global banking crisis
CNBC PUBLISHED THU, MAR 16
Ok, so what does that really mean? “Electrical power projection mechanism that can be used for resource competition”…A lot of military words to say Store of Value and medium of exchange for property, goods (resources) and services. It’s much more simple, IMHO. Bitcoin is money. The perfect money. Let’s write a thesis for what the perfect money will do for us. A lot of Jason’s points are almost correct, except a little off…but I think the biggest mistake is not realizing the government’s Bitcoin paradox. They need to be first, or die. But being first they’ll self-destruct.
When you start with the wrong premise you usually end up with the wrong conclusion. I’m this case big centralized government. The opposite of the ethos of bitcoin. On a tangential note, due to scarcity of bitcoin, large centralized pockets of bitcoin always dissipate to where most value is produced. Thus even if the us will own most Bitcoin initially, it’ll go to the people and places where most value is produced over time.
Jason’s thesis is a classic false premise trap. Bitcoin is money (SoV, MoE and UoA). Not a weapon. His conclusions and recommended actions are based on the the wrong premise and hence at best interesting, at worst an intentional attack vector.
They will likely do a bale out of sorts Investors implore the government to step in after Silicon Valley Bank failure https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/11/silicon-valley-bank-failure-has-investors-calling-for-government-aid.html?__source=iosappshare%7Ccom.apple.UIKit.activity.CopyToPasteboard
Silicon Valley Bank is shut down by regulators, FDIC to protect insured deposits…the FDIC of course doesn’t have any money. So it’ll have to be printed.
Bitcoin can not be halted.
Thx. Missing the last D :)
What is DID?
So what are they going to do? They‘ll squeeze and penny and drop of blood out of the existing system, knowing that, from a game theory perspective, the next best option is to be first on Bitcoin. Buckle up. As soon as some other entity makes a move on Bitcoin, the flood gates will open….