Avatar
Des Imoto マキシ
16897bfab409ff12a768217e14d472dd5e8a2ae11cc0e3340bf2d6f67f5bac83
Bitcoin is the only chance we have | Toxic Maxi | Anarchist | Voluntarist | #Bitcoin | #Plebchain

There’s no such thing as a quantum computer. It’s not even a thing. It’s just adding an obscure word to the word computing to create FUD. It reuses the term from quantum physics, which are mathematical models for things we can’t explain mechanically. I wish people would scratch at least the first layer…

Then you just taught them all they need to know? No need for that $45k teacher brainwashing them…

I think the impact is more serious. What made #Bitcoin different was its scarcity and immutability. With the latter gone Bitcoin is just a speculative asset like everything else. You have the maxis leaving and are left with fiat people. Hence true adoption has stalled. And unless we fix it…

For one thing, there’s no such thing as Quantum Computing….

Replying to Avatar ⚡⚡⚡

There were once two phone networks.

The first was called Bitcoin Mobile. It was young, independent, and strange. It didn’t belong to any government or corporation. Anyone in the world could build a tower for it, as long as they followed the rules. These towers were expensive to run, so the people who built them were paid only when calls were actually made on the network. Every call, every text, every bit of data helped keep the towers alive.

When Bitcoin Mobile was busy, it grew stronger. More calls meant more revenue, more towers, wider coverage, and better security. Attacking the network became nearly impossible, because there were towers everywhere, run by people who had a reason to defend them. The network didn’t survive on promises or reputation. It survived on use.

The second network was called DollarTel.

DollarTel was old. Very old. It had towers on every continent, backed by powerful institutions, courts, armies, and laws. If a tower went down, another would replace it. If a user misbehaved, their line could be cut instantly. People trusted DollarTel not because it was fair, but because it was unavoidable. It had always been there.

One day, clever engineers figured out how to make DollarTel SIM cards work inside Bitcoin phones. They called them stable SIMs. With these SIMs, people could still hold a Bitcoin phone in their hand, but their calls quietly routed through DollarTel’s infrastructure.

At first, everyone was excited.

“You can keep your Bitcoin phone safe in a drawer,” people said, “and just use DollarTel for daily calls. Bitcoin is too precious to spend. It’s digital gold.”

So people stopped calling on Bitcoin Mobile.

They still admired it. They talked about how revolutionary it was. They measured its market value and pointed proudly at the number. But fewer calls were being made. Fewer texts were sent. The towers noticed.

Some tower operators shut down. Others stopped upgrading equipment. Coverage thinned. The network still existed, but it wasn’t as alive as it once was. From the outside, it looked strong. Inside, the hum was fading.

Meanwhile, DollarTel thrived.

Every call people thought they were making “on Bitcoin” was actually strengthening DollarTel. Its towers grew busier. Its control increased. It became easier to monitor, block, or shape communication, because nearly everyone depended on it again.

Years passed.

Bitcoin Mobile was still called “digital gold,” but something had changed. Gold doesn’t need to defend itself. A phone network does. Without calls, its security had quietly weakened. An attacker no longer had to fight millions of towers — only thousands. Influence became cheaper. Pressure became more effective.

And then some people finally noticed the problem.

They realized that Bitcoin Mobile was never meant to be a museum piece. It wasn’t a treasure to lock away and admire. It was a living system. A network that only survives when people use it, pay for it, and rely on it.

They understood, too late for some towers, that holding phones doesn’t keep a network alive. Only calls do.

So a few people started calling again.

Not because it was convenient. Not because it was cheap. But because they understood that every call was a vote. Every call said, “This network should exist.” Every call paid for the towers that made the network free.

And slowly, wherever people chose Bitcoin Mobile over DollarTel, the signal came back.

Not instantly. Not easily.

But honestly.

nostr:nprofile1qqsg86qcm7lve6jkkr64z4mt8lfe57jsu8vpty6r2qpk37sgtnxevjcpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqzrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqaktkhj

I mean, the fact the Core Devs put #Bitcoin‘s immutability into question surely doesn’t help…

Elon Envisions Grokipedia As Humanity's Cosmic Knowledge Vault

Elon Envisions Grokipedia As Humanity's Cosmic Knowledge Vault

https://modernity.news/2025/11/22/elon-envisions-grokipedia-as-humanitys-cosmic-knowledge-vault/

In a far reaching vision for preserving human wisdom against existential threats, Elon Musk described his xAI venture’s Grokipedia as an indestructible archive destined for the Moon, Mars, and beyond.

?itok=iBSCCVcQ

Speaking at the Baron Investment Conference, Musk likened the project to a “modern-day Library of Alexandria,” etched in microfont on stone to safeguard knowledge for future civilizations.

The comments, captured in a viral clip shared on X, underscore Musk’s ambition to transcend Earth’s fragile data repositories.

👀 Elon Musk Says Grokipedia Will Become a Backup of All Knowledge for Future Civilizations

“The idea behind this Galactica is to create an open source … distillation of all knowledge … And then we want to create copies of this and distribute these copies throughout Earth, and… https://t.co/CWSggKCitH

— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1992214408425095368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

“The idea behind this Galactica is to create an open source… distillation of all knowledge… And then we want to create copies of this and distribute these copies throughout Earth, and even put them on the moon and Mars and out of deep space… So in the worst case scenario, future civilization can see what we learned and maybe pick things up from there,” Musk said.

Musk’s remarks came during an onstage interview with Ron Baron, the 82-year-old founder of Baron Capital, a $45 billion asset management firm known for its long-term investments in growth stocks like Tesla.

The annual Baron Investment Conference, in New York, drew hundreds of investors eager for Musk’s insights on everything from electric vehicles to artificial intelligence. Baron, a longtime Tesla shareholder, pressed Musk on xAI’s boldest initiatives, leading to the discussion of Grokipedia—currently slated for a rebrand to “Encyclopedia Galactica,” a nod to sci-fi icons Isaac Asimov and Douglas Adams.

The exchange highlighted Musk’s blend of pragmatism and futurism. Evoking the ancient Library of Alexandria’s tragic burning as a cautionary tale, he proposed “literally etch[ing] it in stone” via microfont technology to ensure durability against disasters, wars, or cosmic mishaps.

Grokipedia emerged from Musk’s long-standing critiques of Wikipedia, which he has repeatedly called “hopelessly biased” due to activist-driven edits and its role as a foundational data source for AI training.

The project was first teased in September, when Musk announced on X: “We are building Grokipedia @xAI. Will be a massive improvement over Wikipedia. Frankly, it is a necessary step towards the xAI goal of understanding the Universe.”

Powered by xAI’s Grok AI models, Grokipedia launched in a beta version a month later as an open-source repository of human knowledge—complete with text, audio, images, and video.

Unlike Wikipedia’s crowd-sourced model, it uses AI to “fact-check” and rewrite entries, purging propaganda, correcting half-truths, and filling gaps through first-principles reasoning. Early adopters praised its depth on niche topics, with Musk noting “Grokipedia has some truly excellent pages.”

The rollout wasn’t without hiccups. Musk delayed the initial release by two weeks to “purge out the propaganda,” and post-launch analyses revealed citations to controversial sources, including 42 references to the neo-Nazi site Stormfront—prompting backlash from media outlets like NBC News and WIRED, which accused it of amplifying far-right narratives.

xAI has since emphasized iterative improvements, allowing users to flag errors via a simple “It’s Wrong” tool.

Musk has amplified Grokipedia’s mission across X, blending announcements with interactive demos. “When Grokipedia is good enough (long way to go), we will change the name to Encyclopedia Galactica. … Join @xAI to help build the sci-fi version of the Library of Alexandria!” Musk urged.

Musk also hyped “Grokipedia will exceed Wikipedia by several orders of magnitude in breadth, depth and accuracy,” quoting gaming executive Mark Kern’s awe at its potential impact.

As xAI iterates toward version 1.0, Musk positions Grokipedia not just as an encyclopedia, but as a bulwark for truth in an AI-driven era. Eclipsing Wikipedia is a certainty, and with copies eyed for off-world deployment, its stakes are literally galactic.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via https://pauljosephwatson.locals.com/support

.

https://cms.zerohedge.com/users/tyler-durden

Sun, 11/23/2025 - 09:20

https://www.zerohedge.com/ai/elon-envisions-grokipedia-humanitys-cosmic-knowledge-vault

Incoherent mumbo jumbo. Like Kindergartner.

Core v30? Certainly put doubt about immutability in my mind. Sure I’m not alone…

Isn’t is a simple as creating another copy of the software, host it, let people know where to download it and follow good documentation practices? The philosophy for this version would be to treat it as frozen unless there’s some as of yet unknown emergency: the feature is there are no features. Bitcoin is perfect for now, no development required.