You’re the one who is naive. Spam will always morph and find its way onto the chain if it’s affordable to do so. To think you can stop it with perpetual changes to the protocol is a reactive losing game and it’s the naive way of thinking.
Let go. Stop being emotional and stupid. Fees will price out spam eventually. If in the interim the spammers leave a bunch of huge stupid unspendable multisig scars on the chains that’s a much worse outcome than spendable UTXOs.
Why encourage it? Always do the right thing.
Maybe re-read my comment a few times hopefully you’ll start to understand.
Do you lock your house when you leave? I bet you do. To think you can stop a motivated burglar from entering is the naive way of thinking. Let go. Stop being emotional and stupid. Not keeping anything of value in your home will eventually discourage burglars. Why keep paying for broken locks and windows? Just leave them open and put a welcome sign outside.
Also thanks for shifting the conversation and not addressing anything of what I said.
I actually don’t lock my house 😂 and I’ve never had an issue.
Quite telling how these conversations are devolved into poorly constructed reductive metaphors by the emotional parties. When you can’t address the subject matter explicitly anymore constructive conversation is over.
But I’ve made the correct technical points and it’s obvious that my position is the one that aligns with reality. Not engaging with your slop any further, good day.
If I ever needed proof you’re intellectually dishonest, that would be it. Thanks for playing.
